by Jose Alberto Nino,

Standing before the Knesset podium on January 5, 2026, Dan Illouz delivered a warning that reverberated across the Atlantic. The Canadian-born Likud member of parliament addressed his colleagues not in Hebrew, but in English, ensuring his message would directly reach American ears.

“We are used to enemies from outside. We fight terror tunnels of Hamas. We fight the ballistic missiles of Iran. But today I look at the West, our greatest ally, and I see a new enemy rising from within,” Illouz declared, according to The Jewish Telegraph Agency. “I am speaking of a poison being sold to the American people as patriotism. I’m speaking of the intellectual vandalism of Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.”

Since the October 7, 2023 attacks against Israel, Carlson and Owens have been some of the most vocal critics of Israel on the American Right. Prior to their pivot towards anti-Israeli discourse, Carlson and Owens were mainstays of conservative media and did not directly address matters of Israeli influence. However, that changed once Israel embarked on an industrial-scale genocide in Gaza.

Illouz’s speech marked an extraordinary moment. A member of Israel’s governing coalition was publicly identifying American conservative media figures as threats to the alliance between Tel Aviv and Washington. For Illouz, the battle against what he sees as creeping antisemitism on the American right represents more than political posturing. Such a groundswell of opposition to the United States’ tight relationship with Israel could potentially jeopardize this arrangement should it continue to grow — a nightmare scenario for world Jewry.

Illouz, like many other Jewish leaders, are catching on to the rising anti-Israel sentiments on the Left and Right. “They claim to fight the woke left. They are no different than the woke left,” Illouz stated. “The radical left tears down the statues of Thomas Jefferson, Tucker Carlson tears down the legacy of Winston Churchill. The radical left says Western civilization is evil, Candace Owens says the roots of our faith are demonic. It is the same sickness.”

His critique of Carlson focused on the former Fox News host’s interview with historian Darryl Cooper, who characterized the Holocaust in terms that outraged Jewish groups. According to Jewish Insider, Illouz told the Knesset that Carlson “nods along when he’s told the Holocaust was a logistical error, a mistake by a camp that was unprepared. This is madness. He spits on the graves of American soldiers who stormed Normandy… Why? To erase the line between good and evil.”

Turning to Owens, whose YouTube channel boasts over 5.7 million subscribers, Illouz accused her of trafficking in ancient hatreds. “She spreads the sickest blood libels… claiming this state was founded by ‘pedophiles.’ She does not know history; she does not know the Bible. She only knows how to peddle hate,” he said, according to Jewish Insider.

The Israeli Knesset member invoked Jewish history to demonstrate the resilience of his people, “We are the people of eternity. We buried the pharaohs who enslaved us. We buried the Greeks who tried to ban our Torah. We buried the Romans who burned our temple. We danced on the ruins of the Third Reich. And we will be here long after your YouTube channels are forgotten dust,” he proclaimed.

When The Times of Israel asked whether he worried about interfering in American politics, Illouz dismissed the concern. “Defending the alliance between America and Israel is not interfering,” he responded. “I am in touch with many pro-Israel conservatives who know that Candace and Tucker are a threat to America as much as to Israel.”

Born on February 21, 1986, in Montreal to Moroccan Jewish parents, Dan Illouz grew up immersed in the traditions of North African Jewry. After graduating from McGill University Law School and earning a master’s degree in public policy from Hebrew University, Illouz made a life-altering decision at age 23. In 2009, he immigrated to Israel, immediately joining the Likud movement. “I was offered the American dream on a silver platter. I chose the Zionist dream and made Aliyah to Israel,” he stated.

He joined the Jerusalem City Council in March 2018 following another councillor’s resignation, won election in October 2018, and served until 2021 under a rotation agreement. Upon entering the Knesset, Illouz renounced his Canadian citizenship, describing it as “not a rejection of my past; it was a conscious act of commitment to Israel’s future.

For Illouz, the fight against Carlson and Owens cannot be separated from his territorial maximalism. His opposition to Palestinian statehood and his advocacy for West Bank annexation form the ideological foundation of his political identity.

“Our rights to the land of Israel include every centimeter of the Land of Israel, including Shchem [Nablus] and Hebron and areas without any Jew living there right now, including Ramallah,” Illouz stated in 2022.

He views this matter in existential terms. “The right to Tel Aviv comes from Judea and Samaria,” he emphasized, employing the biblical terminology for the West Bank favored by fanatic politicians of the Israeli Right.

In July 2024, Illouz delivered another English-language Knesset speech declaring categorical opposition to Palestinian sovereignty. “A Palestinian state is not just a bad idea—it’s a dangerous one, under any circumstances, but especially now. … There will be no Palestinian state. Not now. Not ever,” he stated.

Illouz is more than just talk. He introduced legislation to apply Israeli sovereignty to the Jordan Valley, with an effective date of October 7, 2024, marking the one-year anniversary of the Hamas massacre. “A true victory will be possible only when the enemy feels that October 7 was a mistake, turning it into a day of mourning for them,” Illouz proclaimed.

In July 2025, the Knesset voted 71-13 for a non-binding resolution calling to annex the West Bank, which Illouz co-sponsored. “For the first time ever, the Knesset is expressing official support for the application of Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria. The message from the plenum is clear: Judea and Samaria are not bargaining chips—they are the heart of our land,” he boasted.

Perhaps his most ambitious proposal came in February and March 2025 with the “Jerusalem Metropolitan Bill,” which would incorporate 29 West Bank settlements into a “Jerusalem Metropolis” under Israeli sovereignty. The settlements, including Ma’ale Adumim, Givat Ze’ev, Efrat, and Beitar Illit, house over 180,000 settlers. “Israel has to act according to its interests and without fear. This law is a major step towards full sovereignty [over the West Bank],” Illouz asserted.

This territorial maximalism vision explains why Illouz views Carlson and Owens as existential threats. If American conservative support for Israel erodes, his vision of Greater Israel becomes politically untenable. The alliance with Washington provides diplomatic cover and material support for settlement expansion and potential annexation.

Illouz’s January 2026 speech came amid broader Israeli concerns about antisemitism on the American right. In November 2025, Israeli Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli told the New York Post that he was “far more concerned about antisemitism on the right than on the left.”

Chikli, himself a right-wing Jew who has cultivated relationships with European parties of the Zio-Populist Right, specifically referenced Carlson’s praise of historian Darryl Cooper. “One of the worst moments was when a popular conservative broadcaster called one of the most vile Holocaust deniers in America ‘one of the most honest historians.’ That legitimizes hate—it normalizes it,” Chikli said to the New York Post. Chikli warned against the rising influence of figures like Nick Fuentes and Cooper among young Americans. “Antisemitism has become fashionable for Gen Z,” he continued. “They listen to podcasts, not professors. When people like Nick Fuentes or Darryl Cooper are treated as thought leaders, that’s dangerous. These are neo-Nazis.” In October 2024, Carlson hosted Fuentes on his platform, igniting outrage from Jewish conservatives who warned of the growing reach of antisemitic voices.

Candace Owens responded to Illouz’s speech by claiming “The Likud party in Israel just named me and Tucker Carlson as enemies that must be fought.” Illouz clarified his position, stating “This is a civilizational battle of ideas. Any insinuation of violence is just a desperate silencing tactic.”

Illouz’s relationship with Donald Trump reveals the complexity of his position. When Trump stated in September 2025 that he would not allow Israel to annex Judea and Samaria, Illouz responded assertively. “No international entity, even a great and cherished ally, can dictate to us how to treat our land,” he declared.

Yet by January 2025, when opposing an annexation bill for the Jordan Valley, Illouz adopted pragmatism. “With President Trump reelected, we have a historic opportunity to advance Israeli sovereignty over the Jordan Valley, but it must be done wisely. Rushing ahead with symbolic legislation that has no chance of progressing beyond a preliminary reading only weakens our cause,” he affirmed. In this case, Illouz probably saw Trump as a Judeo-accelerationist president, who overall advances Jewish interests with enthusiasm despite minor deviations, and opted to soften his rhetoric.

For Dan Illouz, the confrontation with Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens represents more than a media spat. It embodies a potential threat to him and his ilk’s ambitions to annex all the West Bank. Recent findings from the Yale Youth Poll demonstrate that a generational realignment progresses steadily, transcending partisan boundaries and increasingly positioning Israel contrary to youth sentiment.

Among voters ages 18 to 22, 30 percent concurred that American Jews maintain greater loyalty to Israel than to the United States. 27 percent agreed that American Jews possess excessive influence. Each metric surpasses national averages considerably.

The survey additionally exposed pervasive confusion surrounding elite discourse regulation. Among all voters, 56 percent expressed uncertainty whether the phrase “globalize the intifada” constitutes antisemitism. A plurality of 47 percent determined that characterizing Gaza’s situation as genocide does not qualify as antisemitic.

The Yale data exists not in isolation but aligns with accumulating polling documenting identical generational upheaval. A University of Maryland Critical Issues Poll discovered that while 52 percent of Republicans aged 35 and older sympathize predominantly with Israel, merely 24 percent of Republicans ages 18 to 34 share this orientation. Regarding Gaza hostilities, 52 percent of older Republicans consider Israeli actions justified, compared to only 22 percent of younger Republicans.

Analysis compiled by RealClearPolling reinforces these patterns. Among Republicans under 50, unfavorable assessments of Israel surged from 35 percent in 2022 to 50 percent in 2025. Older Republicans shifted minimally. Identical University of Maryland research indicates that 41 percent of Americans consider Israeli military operations in Gaza genocidal or analogous to genocide, including 14 percent of Republicans. 21 percent characterize the Trump administration’s Israel-Palestine policy as excessively pro-Israel, while 57 percent maintain American support has facilitated Israeli war crimes.

Even evangelical Republicans no longer prove immune. While 69 percent of older evangelicals sympathize predominantly with Israel, that figure plummets to 32 percent among younger evangelicals, with merely 36 percent considering Israeli actions in Gaza justified. A September 2025 AtlasIntel poll determined that only 30 percent of Americans endorse financial assistance to Israel, representing a dramatic departure from Washington’s bipartisan conventions.

Such anti-Israel sentiments will likely grow stronger as conservative influencers such as Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens gain further popularity among the American public. This does not augur well for Illouz’s vision of Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank.

When that conservative movement begins questioning support for Israel, when influential voices like Carlson and Owens gain traction with antisemitic rhetoric, Illouz sees the foundation of his Greater Israel project threatened. The clock is ticking against Illouz, who sweats bullets knowing Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens could persuade millions of fed-up Americans to finally reject Israel’s grip over the American political system.

 

Source: https://www.unz.com

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

2 COMMENTS

  1. We can straighten this out without being antisemitic. All that is required is the truth.
    The truth is that it is our fault for using the word Jew and Hebrew interchangeably. They are two different words with two different meanings.
    If Americans would just admit that Hebrews are people who have DNA that can seed a planet (Father Many Nations) and Black DNA fits that bill, but anyone can be a Jew since that term is not a genetic term, then they could end the argument and take the wind out of Israel’s argument.
    But because we still refuse to acknowledge that the descendants of the Hebrews are Africans, we can’t end the argument.
    The word ‘Jew’ carries no genetic meaning in the Bible as described by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament Bible; “But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and CIRCUMCISION IS THAT OF THE HEART, IN THE SPIRIT, AND NOT IN THE LETTER; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” (Romans 2:29 KJV).
    Most Americans do not know that the Khazars encyclopedia admits that KHAZARS ADOPTED JUDAISM APPROXIMATELY 1000 YEARS AGO. http://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4279-chazars
    The word Jew is not in the Bible, but blunt publisher manipulation is. https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/08/29/the-word-jew-is-not-in-the-bible/
    The word “Jew” did not come into existence until the year 1775 A.D., whereas the occurrences in the bible took place from around 4000 B.C. to 70 A.D
    The word ‘Hebrew’ is based solely on the ability of one’s DNA to “father many nations” or, seed a planet, which requires a very wide Genome.
    Anyone can be a Jew so its perfectly alright for the Jews to call themselves Jews.
    Modern genetic scientists have found Africans, but NOT in those who occupy Jerusalem, have Genetic Plasticity or Evolutionary Plasticity
    • Definition: The ability of an organism’s genome to produce a wide variety of phenotypic outcomes depending on environment or selective pressures.
    • Application: If the group’s DNA carries vast adaptive potential, enabling rapid diversification to fit a new planetary environment, this would describe genetic or evolutionary plasticity at an extreme scale.
    Africans also possess Genomic Versatility (or Genomic Breadth), biogenetic sovereignty, and evolutionary seeding potential.
    • Definition: A descriptive term (not yet formalized) for the capacity of a genome to express a vast range of adaptive traits — essentially a “broad genetic toolkit.”
    • Application: If this group’s DNA contains immense stored variability allowing them to seed and thrive in multiple environments, you could call this genomic versatility or panadaptive genomics.
    Biogenetic Sovereignty (or Panbiotic Capacity)
    • Definition (emergent conceptual term): The inherent biological autonomy and self-sufficiency to propagate and sustain life across planetary ecosystems.
    • Application: A fitting original term for the description of African DNA could be Panbiotic Capacity — from pan- (all) and biotic (life).
    o Panbiotic Capacity: “The ability of a species or genetic lineage to SEED, adapt, and sustain life on multiple planetary environments due to the extensive variability encoded within its genome.”
    Evolutionary Seeding Potential
    • Another conceptual descriptor — this term emphasizes intentional planetary seeding combined with high genetic adaptability. It could be defined as:
    o “The inherent genomic diversity and adaptability that enables a lineage to propagate viable ecosystems across distinct planetary biospheres.”
    Jews do not possess a very wide Genome and genetic plasticity as proven by the results of the 2012 John Hopkins DNA Study of the Jewish Race.
    But Americans are loathed to accept this correction because it would force them to change how they view African Americans.
    This interpretation of the evidence shows that Africans were the favorite specimen of choice when ETs seeded the planet. With Africans, they had the choice of a wide selection of genes from which to choose and either turn off gene expressions or mutate genes to create new groups of humans.
    The DNA Evidence shows Africans seeded most of the planet and they carry a very wide Genome, “fathering many nations” as only the offspring of the Ancient Hebrews could. Khazarian/Jew DNA is very narrow in diversity and cannot seed a planet.
    The criminal denial of this truth provokes all who know the truth.

    Here is the structure of the Joo’s crime:
    It is intentionally misleading to use an identifier that has no genetic markers (Jew), to make material claims that can only be verified using an identifier that requires a specific genetic marker(Hebrew), namely, the ability to seed a planet, or rather, “father many nations”.
    Jewish control over media allows the omission of the 2012 DNA study results from public discourse. Jewish control over sports, entertainment, politicians and courts allows them to use the omission to act under the color of law and inflict emotional pain and suffering and irreparable harm and damage.
    Why Old Maps Put JUDAH in Africa
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlsBGKw-NvI
    Scientist discovered that the entire human race outside Africa OWES ITS EXISTENCE to the survival of a single AFRICAN tribe of around 200 people who crossed the Red Sea 70,000 years ago. AFRICANS “FATHERED MANY NATIONS.”
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/5299351/African-tribe-populated-rest-of-the-world.html

    Examples of Africans “Fathering Many Nations” based on the DNA Science that PROVES THEY possess a Genome capable of SEEDING A PLANET!

    1. Blacks Fathering the European Nations

    a. Early Europeans who lived 7000 years ago had dark African skin and blue eyes, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dna-ancient-human-spawns-theory-185256880.html

    2. Blacks Fathering the Chinese and Asian Nations

    a. DNA traces Chinese back to Africa, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/183392.stm

    3. Blacks Fathering the Polynesian and Island Nations

    a. 12 discoveries they don’t want you to know about African history, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C-kmwYyc-c

    4. Blacks Fathering the Hindu Nation
    a. Was India Once An African Country?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7waUhoDUN8

    b. Indian Sculpture Debunks History – Shows Ancient African Civilization, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4vJpmkzIz8

    5. First modern Britons had 'dark to black' skin, Cheddar Man DNA analysis reveals
    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/first-modern-britons-dark-black-skin-cheddar-man-dna-analysis-reveals

    6. Early Irish people were dark skinned with blue eyes – documentary
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/early-irish-people-were-dark-skinned-with-blue-eyes-documentary-1.4541124

  2. By taking Jewish religion does not make them Jews.They are Khazars no genetic link to real Jews who are Palestinians and some Ethiopians and Somalis.Nobody is more Antisemitic then them Khazars parading fake Jews.Corrupting Western Governments to punish those who refuse to believe their lies.Prominent Zionists like Theodore Herzl and Arthur Koestler have said long ago that Askhenazi Jews how they like to call themselves do not have genetic link with real Jews.Irony of their lies is they claim they are Gods chosen but they do not believe in god.They are Satan worshipers.If white Man converts to Islam this does not make him genetically an Arab.Just because their Uncle has hijacked Government money printing machine does not give them right to push their lies into our throats and massacre Children.Disclaimer I do not hate any one but I do hate lies.As long so called Semites behave like Termites people will hate them,not me.Best info about them is HIDDEN HISTORY OF INCREDIBLE EVIL KHAZARIAN MAFIA by Preston James.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here