Pfizer has been caught hiding sudden deaths during the clinical trials for the pharmaceutical giant’s Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

The hidden deaths were discovered during a major 1 and half year investigation by a team of researchers.

The team, volunteering for the non-profit news outlet The Daily Clout, revealed that these deaths were covered up to hide serious adverse reactions from the public.

During the investigation, the team of researchers, including physicians, a data expert, and a former United States Army Intelligence officer, analyzed thousands of pages of documents relating to the study.

They found that Pfizer had failed to report the deaths of two women during the trial.

One woman died in Kansas and the other one was in Georgia.

Not only did Pfizer fail to report the deaths, but the company actively covered them up.

It appears that the deaths were hidden because regulators would have considered the “vaccines” too dangerous for public use.

According to Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, an anesthetist and perioperative physician in Australia; who was part of the team, the study protocol required that any “death or serious adverse effect” had to be reported within 24 hours.

In the Kansas case that did not happen for 37 days.

The Kansas case was a 63-year-old woman who had her first dose of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine on August 18, 2020.

The woman received her second dose on September 8, 2020.

She died of a sudden cardiac arrest on October 19, 2020.

The woman’s emergency contact immediately informed the clinical site — Alliance for Multispecialty Research LLC, in Newton, Kansas.

Thirty-seven days later, on November 25, 2020 — 11 days after the data reporting cutoff date — the death was finally recorded in a “case report form.”

The death was added to the report five days after the emergency use application was submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Pfizer.

The participant’s death was not reported in the trial results in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine or to the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), which approved the EUA.

According to a letter Kunadhasan sent to Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach — who is suing Pfizer over the vaccine — an autopsy recorded the cause as “sudden cardiac death.”

Pfizer physicians ruled her death was not related to the vaccine, citing “risk factors” for heart disease to include hypertension and obesity.

However, according to Kunadhasan, the patient was hardly obese but rather mildly overweight, at approximately 5 feet 4 inches tall and 163 pounds.

“To be eligible for inclusion in this clinical trial, participants had to be deemed healthy based on medical history, physical examination (if required), and the clinical judgment of the investigator.

“The protocol allowed healthy participants with pre-existing stable disease – defined as disease not requiring significant change in therapy or hospitalization for worsening disease during the six weeks before enrolment – to participate in the clinical trial,” Kunadhasan wrote.

“This patient was medicated with two different antihypertensives and had encountered clinical trial personnel at least three times with no mention of any worryingly high blood pressure readings.

“In fact, I cannot find any blood pressure reading in her publicly available case notes.

“Consequently, I can only assume the patient’s high blood pressure, from which she had suffered since January 1st, 2010, was well-controlled when she was admitted to the trial.”

The patient was 165cm tall and weighed 74.1kg.

Her BMI (body mass index) of 27.2 put her in the overweight category, not obese.

The second hidden death was a 58-year-old woman in Georgia.

She received her first dose on August 4, 2020, and a second on August 27, 2020.

The woman died suddenly of a cardiac arrest in her sleep on November 7, 2020.

Her husband immediately informed the clinical site.

The death was not added to the data for 26 days and first followed up on December 3, 2020 — again well after the Nov. 14 data cutoff date.

The woman had taken a muscle relaxer and valium for chronic back pain prior to going to bed, but both were medications “previously used by the subject.”

In a letter to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is also suing Pfizer, Kunadhasan notes that there was no autopsy.

A coroner was simply called to pronounce death.

The trial investigator simply declared there was “no reasonable possibility that the cardiac arrest was related to the study intervention.”

However, without an autopsy, how can anyone know?

The information has emerged as Pfizer has just suffered a major legal blow.

As Slay News reported, a federal judge has just ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release the sealed documents for pharmaceutical Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” trials.

Pfizer and the FDA have been battling in the courts to keep the documents hidden from the public for 75 years.

However, the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) brought a high-profile case against the FDA to force the release of over one million pages of documents.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas has just ruled against the FDA and ordered the release of the Pfizer docs.

The files are related to the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid mRNA “vaccine.”

The decision mandates the FDA to release the EUA file for the Pfizer injection no later than June 30, 2025.

The case stemmed from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by the PHMPT.

The PHMPT is a group of scientists and public health professionals seeking comprehensive data on the vaccine’s approval process.

The FOIA request sought comprehensive data related to the Pfizer “vaccine.”

The FDA had tried to keep the documents sealed for the next few decades, or until most adults alive during the pandemic were no longer around.

The federal agency claimed it would need up to 75 years to process and release the requested documents.

However, President Donald Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman rejected this argument.

The Texas judge cited the importance of government accountability and gave the FDA just under seven months to release the documents to the public.

From slaynews.com

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here