Why Would Anyone Choose to Receive an Experimental COVID mRNA Injection?

From HealthImpactNews.com:

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The headlines and subject matter of our articles the past couple of weeks have been very somber, documenting how serious injuries and deaths are happening just shortly after people have been injected with one of the two experimental mRNA COVID injections by either Pfizer, or Moderna.

Big Pharma, the U.S. Government, and the Pharma-controlled media continue to try and downplay these deaths and injuries, denying that they have any relationship to receiving these COVID injections.

However, the evidence that we have presented here at Health Impact News, paints a very different picture, suggesting that this issue is far more serious than the corporate media, and even most in the alternative media, are reporting.

So this begs the question: Why would anyone choose to receive one of these injections in the first place?

Most people who have received one of these injections, or plan to receive one, would probably answer something like: “To prevent me from getting the COVID-19 virus, or prevent me from spreading it to others.”

For those of us trying to shine truth and light into darkness and deception, I really think this is where the conversation needs to begin.

For those who are less informed and simply have a religious-like faith in vaccines in general, and the experimental COVID injections specifically, without ever having spent much time actually researching them, we need to stop defending what we have learned, and instead ask them to defend their faith in these shots, and then be prepared to answer their positive beliefs in these shots with verifiable facts that they can look up and research themselves.

What Does the FDA Say About the Experimental COVID Shots?

So let’s begin with what the official FDA guidelines, published on the FDA government website, state as facts regarding these injections.

For the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” you can find the FDA’s Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine and the Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers on the FDA website here.

For the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” you can find the FDA’s Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine and the Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers on the FDA website here.

Fact #1 – These “vaccines” are NOT approved by the FDA.

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet:

There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

HAS THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE BEEN USED BEFORE? The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine.

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet:

There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

HAS THE MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE BEEN USED BEFORE? The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine.

Fact #2 – Risks to these Unapproved Vaccines are UNKNOWN

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers, after giving a list of possible side effects, then states:

These may not be all the possible side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine gives a more comprehensive list of Serious Adverse Events:

* Serious adverse events are defined as:
• Death;
• A life-threatening adverse event;
• Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
• A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
• A congenital anomaly/birth defect;
• An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers, after giving a list of possible side effects, then states:

These may not be all the possible side effects of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine gives a more comprehensive list of Serious Adverse Events:

*Serious adverse events are defined as:
• Death;
• A life-threatening adverse event;
• Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
• A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
• A congenital anomaly/birth defect;
• An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Fact #3 – Efficacy in preventing COVID-19 is UNKNOWN

FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet:

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect everyone.

In an ongoing clinical trial, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has been shown to prevent COVID-19 following 2 doses given 3 weeks apart. The duration of protection against COVID-19 is currently unknown.

FDA Moderna Fact Sheet:

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19.

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect everyone.

In an ongoing clinical trial, the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine has been shown to prevent COVID-19 following 2 doses given 1 month apart. The duration of protection against COVID-19 is currently unknown.

What do Dissenting Doctors and Scientists Say about the Experimental, Non-FDA Approved COVID mRNA “Vaccines”?

When you purchase something online, do you read reviews of the product first, to find out what people say about that product, both positive and negative?

If you make a major purchase, such as purchasing a home or car, do you research all the positive and potential negative data that is available about this major purchase, prior to making a decision?

Or do you just accept the marketing sales data about that product at face value without researching to see if their claims are accurate, including possibly searching to see if any complaints have been logged against the manufacturer with places like the Better Business Bureau, etc.?

When dealing with a biological agent that is injected into your body with potential far-reaching effects on your health, would you not want to do the same thing, and to hear dissenting views as well as the “marketing sales data” that Big Pharma is presenting?

When it comes to vaccines in general, and the experimental mRNA COVID injections in particular, Big Pharma, the U.S. Government health agencies, and their corporate media outlets, do not believe that you have a right to hear dissenting views, because they believe they are the only authority when it comes to matters of “public health.”

As a result, those with dissenting views, which many times include whistleblowers who used to work for Big Pharma, are heavily censored, and if the information gets out past their censorship, then those doctors and scientists are slandered and called “quacks” or “fringe doctors,” etc.

Any product that cannot handle criticism to the point that significant finances and resources are spent trying to censor any negative information about those products, should raise red flags.

The facts I am presenting here are the facts that highly credentialed and intelligent doctors and scientists do not believe that these experimental mRNA injections should be tested on the public.

What they actually say is their opinion. But the doctors and scientists who work for the FDA, almost all of whom are financially connected to Big Pharma, also are offering their opinions when they recommend that a non-FDA approved biological injection should be given “emergency use authorization” due to a “pandemic” that is now over a year old, with no end in sight.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg

Dr. Sin Hang Lee is a pathologist and founder of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, a CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory in Milford, Connecticut.

Dr. Lee is a world-renowned expert on DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. He has trained and taught in some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.

He recognized very early on that the PCR tests and other tests fast-tracked by the FDA were not accurate in identifying SARSCoV-2 RNA, and even sent a letter, back in March, to Dr. Margaret Harris and Dr. Eduardo Guerrero of the World Health Organization, and Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explaining why the tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA were generating false positives and negatives.

You can read his March 22, 2020 letter here. He explained that a two-phased test would “guarantee no-false positive results” based on his research and published work from Japan.

He never received a response to his letter.

As 2020 was drawing to a close and it was well-known that the FDA was preparing to issue emergency use authorizations to Pfizer and Moderna for the experimental mRNA injections, Dr. Lee filed an ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION with the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The STAY OF ACTION was a Petition for Administrative Action Regarding Confirmation of Efficacy End Points of Phase III Clinical Trials of COVID19 Vaccines.

The STAY OF ACTION is based upon the faulty PCR tests that were used in the vaccine trials:

Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.

Read the full Stay of Action here.

The FDA never even replied to this filing, let alone have their attorneys try to defend their actions.

Similar to Dr. Lee’s Stay of Action filed with the FDA, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. Michael Yeadon filed an emergency STAY OF ACTION with the European Medicines Agency.

This STAY OF ACTION was very similar to the one filed with the FDA in the U.S. by Dr. Sin Hang Lee, and demanded that clinical trials be STOPPED until there was an accurate testing mechanism in place to correctly identify SARS-CoV-2, since the PCR test is very inaccurate.

Dr. Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, also went public in a viral video recording where he stated that the COVID Pandemic is over, and that it is being kept alive by false narratives using the faulty PCR tests. See:

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

In their STAY OF ACTION filed in Europe, one day BEFORE the U.K. issued emergency use authorization, Dr. Yeadon stated that this experimental vaccine can make females infertile.

He writes that the Pfizer COVID vaccine as well as other COVID vaccines currently in Phase III trials are:

expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” – http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019-against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.

There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.

To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).

This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. (Source.)

Dr. David Martin, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, and others: These are NOT vaccines

Dr. David Martin, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, and many other doctors and scientists claim that the mRNA experimental COVID injections do NOT meet the legal definition of a “vaccine,” and that the FDA is calling these injections “vaccines” to cover themselves legally.

These are NOT fringe doctors and scientists. While I have never met Dr. Martin, I have known Dr. Tenpenny for more than a decade, and Dr. Mikovits for several years now, and have published much of their work here on Health Impact News.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a doctor of Osteopathy, and one of the world’s most articulate researchers when it comes to vaccines. She is a highly sought expert to speak on the issue, and a well-published author.

Dr. Judy Mikovits has years of government research experience working directly with Dr. Anthony Fauci and others, and has suffered greatly in her life for blowing the whistle on government fraud in research. Along with Dr. David Martin, she was featured in the film produced by filmmaker Mikki Willis, Plandemic. See:

PLANDEMIC: Full Feature Film Released Online Amidst Tremendous Opposition and Attempts to Censor it

In a recent 2-hour live stream event called “Focus on Fauci,” Dr. David Martin explained that the current experimental mRNA COVID injections are not vaccines, but medical devices.

This is not a vaccine.

We need to be really clear. We’re using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions.

This is not a vaccine. This is an mRNA packaged in a fat envelope, that is delivered to a cell.

It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.

It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term, and they’re a legally defined term under public health law, they’re legally defined term under the CDC and FDA standards.

And a vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity within the person who is receiving it, but it also has to disrupt transmission.

And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell, it is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment.

But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of the public health authorities, because then people would say, well what other treatments are there? (Full article.)

See also:

The New mRNA COVID Vaccines Inject an Operating System into Your Body – Not a Conspiracy Theory, Moderna Admits It

Dr. Mikovits and Dr. Tenpenny have previously stated, prior to the FDA issuing EUAs for these experimental injections, that if these experimental “vaccines” were administered to the U.S. population, that there would be at least 50 million people murdered by lethal injection. See:

Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S.

Hundreds of Doctors Worldwide Warn Against the Experimental mRNA Injections

Dozens of doctors from around the world came together to issue a dire warning about the experimental mRNA injections, and created a video where they all testified.

Since publishing this video on our Bitchute Channel about 6 weeks ago, it has been viewed by over 375,000 people.

Can we Trust the Pharmaceutical Companies Making these “Vaccines”?

Short answer: no!

These are criminal organizations, and you can verify this for yourself by searching the Department of Justice (DOJ) website and see which group of businesses has the most cases of criminal fraud settled each year.

Here is a report I have used in the past covering the years 2009 through 2016, but there may be a more recent report:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/918366/download

Health Care Fraud led the pack, with over $19 BILLION in settlements, and no serious close competitors.

As we have previously reported, Pfizer is one of the largest criminal organizations in the world, having repeatedly paid out BILLIONS of dollars in settlements for fraud, including a 2009 settlement for fraud that they reached with the U.S. Department of Justice for $2.3 BILLION, the largest ever fraud settlement in the history of the DOJ at that time. (Source.).

See:

Criminal Pfizer Inc. Wins COVID Vaccine Race? Hundreds of Millions of Doses Expected to be Ready Within Weeks

These are verifiable facts from the DOJ website, and these are the companies you are trusting when you get an experimental mRNA COVID injection.

Can We Trust the FDA and the CDC?

Can you trust a fox to watch your hen house?

The CDC is the largest purchaser of vaccines in the world, allocating over $5 BILLION in their budget (supplied by American taxpayers) each year to purchase and distribute vaccines from Big Pharma. See:

Should the CDC Oversee Vaccine Safety When They Purchase Over $5 Billion of Vaccines from Big Pharma?

Do you think this might be a conflict of interest??

Secondly, the CDC owns over 56 patents on vaccines, and many of their scientists earn royalties from the sale of vaccines. (Source.)

Do you think this might be a conflict of interest??

The CDC has a long history of corruption, and over the years many of their own scientists have tried to blow the whistle on this corruption only to be silenced. See some of our previous coverage on CDC corruption:

CDC Scientist Whisteblowers Confirm Corruption Within the CDC

CDC Whistleblower: CDC Covered Up MMR Vaccine Link to Autism in African American Boys

The CDC’s History of Research Fraud Regarding Vaccines and Autism

Can We Trust the CDC? British Medical Journal Reveals CDC Lies About Ties to Big Pharma

In addition, many of the directors running the CDC go on to work for Big Pharma after they complete their term at the CDC. See:

Former CDC Director that Approved Gardasil Vaccine and Became Head of Merck’s Vaccine Division Named “Woman of the Year”

Dr. Scott Gottlieb was the former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner. He joined the board of directors of Pfizer, Inc.—the world’s largest pharmaceutical company and second largest manufacturer of vaccines, in 2019 just shortly after he left the FDA. Pfizer, which posted total revenues of $53.7 billion in 2018, announced Dr. Gottlieb’s election to the board on June 27, 2019.

On July 22, 2020 President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” project awarded $1.95 BILLION to Pfizer and BioNTech for 100 million doses of their mRNA-based COVID-19.

So what do you think? Can we trust the CDC and the FDA?

And tell me again why you want to get injected with one of these non-FDA approved experimental injections?

Memorize this information. Copy it, print it, save it, share it.

Start your conversations with anyone thinking about getting one of these injections with a question:

Why do you want to receive a non-FDA approved experimental mRNA COVID injection?

Put THEM on the defensive. Listen to their answer, and then quietly, in gentleness and hopefully in love, share some REAL FACTS with them, starting with what the FDA has published regarding these injections.

They probably truly believe they are doing something good for themselves and public heath, but in fact they are doing something that only benefits Big Pharma and the Globalists’ agenda, which is now led by a former computer nerd and college drop-out, Bill Gates.

We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn.

In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again.

You need milk, not solid food! Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness.

But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil. (Hebrews 5:11-14) (Why you should be reading the Bible to combat propaganda and mind control.)

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.