History has been made. After 7 years of pursuing legal action against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the risk posed to the developing brain by the practice of water fluoridation, the United States District Court of the Northern District of California has just ruled on behalf of the Fluoride Action Network and the plaintiffs in our precedent-setting court case. A U.S. federal court has now deemed fluoridation an “unreasonable risk” to the health of children, and the EPA will be forced to regulate it as such. The decision is written very strongly in our favor.
Below is an excerpt from the introduction of the ruling:
“The issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the United States poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health of the public within the meaning of Amended TSCA. For the reasons set forth below, the Court so finds. Specifically, the Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter (“mg/L”) – the level presently considered “optimal” in the United States – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children..the Court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response…One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this Court’s finding, is to ignore that risk.”
In this moment we want to recognize attorney Michael Connett for pursuing this case and leading the effort every step of the way. He’s a true superhero to all of us here at FAN. Many other amazing team members were also involved in making this a reality and deserve great appreciation and thanks, including our co-plaintiffs and all of you who donated and spread the word about our case. Take a moment to celebrate this momentous occasion, wherever you are. After 7 years, we all deserve it.
From Fluoridealert.org
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.
Congratulations – Good job!
A very long and hard to Battle Fight task long long time in earnings. WELL DONE.
Why consume highly toxic floor cleaner and neurotoxin. Consider the construction of a simple Tooth brush.1000 or so finely tuned bristle so fine they even grade tooth brush as fine smooth silky medium. etc and yet the tips are razor sharp enough to micro-etch and cut/scratching the flesh of the gums "technique up/down" enabling the chemical Sodium Fluoride to enter the body micro dose each an every brushing, let alone drink it in water public purchased bottles of water and few other source all for the consumption and harm resulting, this also has by some attributes to Calcifying the Pineal gland.
Add Everyday Chemicals to this list and find to eliminate both This is a BIG part of the picture puzzle We all are under. Winning a court case is one thing. WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS IN/BY RESULTING FOR THIS WIN.
PS: there was a horrifying article at GeoEngineeringWatch.org in the Health Section posted many years ago in collection by Science and Dr research. as to sodium fluoride and its harms.