Choreographed Tragedy: 24 Years After 9/11

Choreographed Tragedy: 24 Years After 9/11

Rev. Kat Carroll

It’s hard to believe that it’s been 24 years since 9/11, and there are still so many unanswered questions. On the very eve of this anniversary, the nation reels from the tragic death of Charlie Kirk — gunned down while speaking on a college campus. He was only 31, an activist, a husband, and a father of two. His passing is more than a personal loss; it echoes the long pattern of silenced voices and unresolved truths that shadow our history.

History shows us that such events rarely happen in a vacuum. From the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr., to the unexplained collapse of Building 7, crucial truths have been buried under secrecy, commissions, and hidden agendas. Decades later, we still don’t have all the facts, because what’s really at stake is often tied to power and money — things that those in control will go to great lengths to protect.

Twenty-four years since 9/11, and still, so many questions remain. Few are unaware of the event, unless born in the early part of the new Millenia. I don’t know if this event is discussed in history classes or in training for architects, but it certainly deserves another look on its anniversary.

Why do I call this a choreographed tragedy? Because of the number of moving pieces that had to be coordinated to pull so many strings at nearly the same time. It took planning, years in advance, rather like the planning that went into Covid and the vaccination program.

If there is any common thread, it’s to cause panic and fear. Like the Hegelian Dialectic, people asked for — or accepted — sweeping governmental changes they didn’t know they needed. A constant state of surveillance, more government power, and keeping pesky secrets out of the public eye (all for the sake of “National Security”). But who is really protected by such changes?

Corporations, the Government, the Military Industrial Complex… and Big Pharma.

• Ron Johnson Has Gone Full 9/11 Conspiracy Nut
• GOP Senator to Hold Hearings on Bonkers 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
• Ron Johnson Goes Full 9/11 Truther in Deranged Rant
• GOP’s Ron Johnson peddles fringe 9/11 conspiracy theories, reaches new low

And yet, when it came to facts of Sept. 11, 2001, Johnson claims he was unaware of Building 7. How is that possible for someone who would eventually come to work with the Department of Homeland Security? Was this topic quickly swept under the carpet and considered “case closed” due to the many uncomfortable facts, and the people involved who wanted to avoid exposure?

Those headlines are a classic example of the Nancy Pelosi style smear campaign — mock, discredit, and isolate until the questions stop being asked. In government circles, it’s often easier to destroy a person’s credibility than to address the facts head-on.

Johnson’s expressed ignorance of building 7 highlights exactly why a deeper look at the evidence still matters today. The last to fall, with only minor fire damage… not enough to cause structural failure.

What if building 7 actually held the deepest secrets that many don’t want exposed, and the first two buildings were a distraction while evidence disappeared. What could not be removed was conveniently obliterated and buried to history.  Johnson states he wants to have another hearing on the topic. I only hope that his attempt to gain traction on the subject, will not be like the UAP hearings, resulting in little or no real progress.

There are still too many questions and, no doubt, inconvenient facts surrounding the issue. The real questions have not always been properly addressed or shared with the public. It takes real digging.

Let’s look at some facts:

• Cell Phone Calls: In 2001, calls from cruising altitude were nearly impossible with civilian cell phones. The FBI’s own evidence shows that almost all calls from Flight 93 were made through seat-back Airfones, not cell phones. Yet the official story leaned heavily on emotional cell call narratives — some of which may have been pre-recorded or scripted to emotionally anchor the public. It was gut wrenching to hear those calls.
• Fly-by-Wire Technology: Around this time, new FAA systems and contractor-installed guidance upgrades allowed for remote override of commercial aircraft. Marketed as “anti-hijack” safety measures, these systems could theoretically seize control from pilots. If exploited, they could also become the perfect hijack tool, explaining impossible maneuvers like Flight 77’s precision strike on the Pentagon.
• Military Drills: On 9/11, NORAD and other agencies were running live exercises simulating hijacked planes used as weapons. Controllers and pilots had to ask in real time: “Is this real-world or exercise?” That fog of war meant jets were scrambled to the wrong locations, delaying response just long enough for the tragedy to unfold.
• Debris and Electronics: Rather than preserve the crime scene, steel beams were quickly cut, shipped overseas, and melted down — a direct violation of investigative procedure. Meanwhile, eyewitnesses reported that computer components were carefully separated from the rubble before the rest was discarded. Evidence was not examined — it was erased.
• Shanksville, Pennsylvania: Witnesses state the hole from the “crashed” airline flight 93 already existed, and debris was thrown into it and lit on fire to simulate a crash… (poorly).
• Pentagon:  On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld stated that the Pentagon could not account for $2.3 trillion in transactions. On 9/11, Security Footage showed a low a low flying missile, not a jet liner, that struck the building, conveniently in the financial management wing — killing analysts and destroying records tied to that investigation. It was reported in the news as American Airlines flight 77.
• Unnatural Fires: Independent researchers and lab tests found traces of thermite, a high-temperature incendiary, in the dust and debris. Pools of molten steel burned beneath the rubble for weeks, far longer than jet fuel or office fires could account for. Firefighters described metal “flowing like lava” in the basements of the towers. These are classic signatures of a rigged demolition, not a natural collapse.
• Insurance and Profit: Just six weeks before the attacks, Larry Silverstein signed a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center and took out massive insurance policies covering terrorist attacks. Afterward, he argued the two plane impacts were separate events, nearly doubling his payout to over $4.55 billion. Follow the money, and the choreography becomes clearer. Double Indemnity
• Conflicting Ground Reports: As happens in chaotic events, eyewitnesses gave wildly different accounts of explosions, planes, and debris. Yet instead of being carefully cataloged, many testimonies were dismissed or ignored — especially those describing explosions inside the towers before collapse.
• Foreign Involvement: The public narrative pointed toward Saudi hijackers and al-Qaeda, but deeper layers — including alleged Mossad monitoring teams, Pakistani ISI money transfers, and Saudi intelligence ties — remain obscured. Even today, key evidence about foreign involvement is redacted or buried, fueling suspicion that surface blame was assigned while deeper networks remained untouchable.
• Building 7’s Secrets: WTC 7 housed offices for the CIA, Secret Service, SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), and IRS, along with New York’s Emergency Operations Center. Thousands of case files were lost when it collapsed — including SEC investigations into Wall Street fraud (like Enron) and IRS probes. Evidence that could have triggered indictments for financial crimes simply vanished into dust.

Together, building 7 and the Pentagon strike erased both Wall Street and military financial accountability. When you follow the money, the choreography is too precise to ignore.

Just as it was clear there was no “lone gunman” in the JFK assassination, and likely in the shooting of Charlie Kirk. These are meticulously planned, and the greater the profit, the longer the planning period. It takes a lot of people to pull these types of events off, and the truth will eventually come out.

Johnson states he wants to have another hearing on the topic. Considering past attempts to gain any real traction on the subject, I’m hoping it will not be like the UAP hearings… A continued limited hangout. And what about JFK, MLK, RFK, and JFK Jr.? Where is the information and any kind of resolution for an aging population still waiting for answers? Why only a partial disclosure?

Final thoughts

Where is truth in these actions that were planned and carried out in secret? Where is justice when our governments or corporations are involved with hiding information, because it would be inconvenient to their bottom line?

At least Senator Johnson has been questioning Covid and Big Pharma. I tip my hats for his digging for more truth in 9/11, even if 24 years later.

I pray there will come a day when we decide the worth of another is not based on their  income, net worth, and the wealth they amassed, (especially if acquired by fraudulent means) that any normal citizen would be jailed for. And for those who gained from any of the events mentioned here… You can’t take it with you, and karma will balance the ledgers.

Charlie Kirk’s untimely death reminds us that silenced voices are not just history, they are happening still. From JFK to 9/11 to today, the choreography of secrecy and suppression continues. To honor the lives lost — both then and now — we must refuse to forget, and continue pressing for truth.

Inspiration for this article: https://corbettreport.com/senator-ron-johnson-dares-to-question-9-11/

Other Sources:

https://corbettreport.com/senator-ron-johnson-dares-to-question-9-11/ Full Video

11 September 2001: The conspiracy theories still spreading after 20 years

Architects and Engineers ongoing reports on 9/11

 

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.