From Parmiweb.com:

BREAKING NEWS: Doctors and Scientists Write to European Medicines Agency Warning of COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers

A group of scientists and doctors has today issued an open letter calling on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to answer urgent safety questions regarding COVID-19 vaccines, or withdraw the vaccines’ authorisation.

“There are serious concerns that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature”

The letter describes serious potential consequences of COVID-19 vaccine technology, warning of possible autoimmune reactions, blood clotting abnormalities, stroke and internal bleeding, “including in the brain, spinal cord and heart”. The authors request evidence that each medical danger outlined “was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.”

“Should all such evidence not be available”, the authors write, “we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.”

The letter is addressed to Emer Cooke, Executive Director of the EMA, and was sent on Monday 1 March 2021. The letter was copied to the President of the Council of Europe and the President of the European Commission.

It states: “We are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions.” However, “there are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute ‘human experimentation’, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.”

Link to letter: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595

Video statementby Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene: https://lbry.tv/@Doctors4CovidEthics:d/Prof.-Sucharit-Bhakdi-statement-on-EMA-open-letter.ENG:0

For commentcontact Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD: [email protected] Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD:[email protected]

In a public statement the group said…

“No sooner did we deliver our letter than the Norwegian Medicines Agency warned that COVID-19 vaccines may be too risky for use in the frail elderly, the very group these vaccines are designed to protect. We would add that, by virtue of the mechanisms of action of the vaccines, to stimulate the production of spike protein, which has adverse pathophysiological properties, there may also be vulnerable people who are not old and already ill. New data shows that vaccine side effects arethree times as common in those who have previously been infected with coronavirus, for example. None of the vaccines have undergone clinical testing for more than a few months, which is simply too short for establishing safety and efficacy.

“Therefore, as a starting point, we believe it is important to enumerate and evaluate all deaths which have occurred within 28 days of vaccination, and to compare the clinical pictures with those who have not been vaccinated.

“More broadly, with respect to the development of COVID-19 vaccines, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has stated in their Resolution 2361, on 27th January 2021, that member states must ensure all COVID-19 vaccines are supported by high quality trials that are sound and conducted in an ethical manner. EMA officials, and other regulatory bodies in EU countries, are bound by these criteria. They should be made aware that they may be violating Resolution 2361 by applying medical products still in phase 3 studies.

“Under Resolution 2361, member states must also inform citizens that vaccination is NOT mandatory and ensure that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to become vaccinated. States are further required to ensure that no one is discriminated against for not receiving the vaccine.”

The letter comes as a petition against UK Government plans for vaccine passports passed 270,000 signatures, more than double that required to compel consideration for debate by MPs. The petition will be debated in the UK Parliament on 15th March 2021.

Doctors and scientists can sign the open letter by sending their name, qualifications, areas of expertise and country of practice to:[email protected]

 

 

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

6 COMMENTS

  1. 'The letter comes as a petition against UK Government plans for vaccine passports passed 270,000 signatures, more than double that required to compel consideration for debate by MPs. The petition will be debated in the UK Parliament on 15th March 2021.'

    So much for that petition. the UK Slave Govt has gone ahead with its plans anyway, just as its masters wish. Petitions are a waste of time. They are actually sources of data collection, to red flag those of us who soon to be categorised as 'extremists' and 'domestic terrorists.' At the rate events are moving in the UK, I doubt I'll be alive by this time next year.

  2. I believe in education and comparing notes, doing my own research. There's actual proof of the vaccines being unsafe, that is, untested, distributed while still being in the 3rd phase. We seem to grow up fast now, beginning to think for ourselves, making our own choices. To some, it's a difficult task, to many it's like groping in the dark, tcomplacent, to some it's an effort, part of trailblazing.

    What follows is information regarding the effects of the present vaccination program. It's discussed in an interview, with 2 lawyers. The lawyer who shared the following information is Maria Louise Genet. The video is banned by YouTube.

    It's a bit of homework to read through, but it's educational as much as raising questions if you see what's going on. Not meant to be in fear, but to be informed, and therefore capable of making choices based on knowledge. The choice to take the vaccine is entirely up to you, as it should be. A new element, in this present time of fast forward awakening within our DNA, is (I welcome you to ponder this) the consideration that humanity may be just in time to transmute damaging side-effects of the present vaccines. To me, it's a valuable thought to keep in mind, in sync with the awareness that the material world is less dense, including our physicality, shifting in higher "gear" so to speak.

    From my point of view, it's helpful to be informed about what is entering my body, moreover, informed about how it's possible to produce a vaccine, in such a short period of time, while normally, it takes at least a decade to present one. Carers, doctors and nurses, are reporting about elderly care home residents, showing flu symptoms within days or weeks after the 1st vaccination, and most of them passing away.

    One virologist-expert, Judy Mikovits, predicts that the vaccines work as a killswitch, due to the substances in them and due to the experimental phase 3 the producers, Pfizer Biontech and Moderna, have been given a green light.

    Pfizer Biontech has declared in their protocol of vaccine-production, that the vaccine that is now distributed, is in phase 3 of testing, therefore declaring it as still in the experimental phase. In normal procedures, phase 4 is completing the production, with tests and research on side-effects of the vaccine, on animals and humans. Which is said to be expected to be complete at the start of2023.

    Also here, it's described as "conditional authorization" (for Pfizer)
    "21 December 2020
    COMIRNATY® (also known as BNT162b2) will be granted a conditional authorisation by the European Commission to place the first mRNA vaccine on the market; this milestone is a global, concerted effort to produce the first approved mRNA vaccine.

    You can read about it at this link: https://www.pfizer.co.uk/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-meeting-all-primary-efficacy-endpoints

    This is the Moderna declaration about the experimental phase ending in 2023: (I've translated this part in English, for the link is in Dutch)
    E. SPECIFIC OBLIGATIONS TO BE FULFILLED AFTER GRANTING A CONDITIONAL AUTHORISATION

    This is a conditional authorisation and in accordance with Article 14a (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. In order to complete the characteristics of the active substance and the production process of the finished product, the holder of the authorisation must provide additional determined information within the specified timeframe:

    Description deadline
    January 2021
    In order to complete the characteristics of the active substance and the production process of the finished product, the authorisation holder shall provide additional data.

    April 2021
    In order to confirm the consistency of the active substance and the production process of the complete product (initial and final scales), the licensor holder should provide additional comparative and validating data.

    June 2021
    To this date, the monthly in between-time reports are distributed. In order to ensure consistent product quality, the licences holder should provide additional information on stability, assess the stability of the active substance and the finished product and the specifications of the working substance and the finished product after a further experience with production.

    December 2022 (at the same time Pfizer Biontech completes the 4th phase)
    In order to confirm the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna, the holder should submit the final Clinical Research Report for the randomised, placebo-controlled, observer-blind mRNA-1273-P301 study.

    According to Moderna: (I've translated this part from Dutch again)
    "Individuals 18 years and older
    The COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna is administered in a 2-dose course (0.5 ml each). It is recommended to administer the second dose 28 days after the first dose (see sections 4.4 and 5.1).
    No data are available on the interchangeability of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna, with other COVID-19 vaccines, to complete the vaccination course. Individuals who have received the first dose COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna should be given the second dose of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna to complete the vaccination course.

    Paediatric patients
    The safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna in children or adolescents in the age of fewer than 18 years have not yet been established. No data is available".

    Another decision, which is synchronized with the 2020 start of vaccine-research and production, is the following change of a law that forbids GMO application in the production of vaccines:

    "On 17 July 2020, the European Commission published a Regulation which came into force a day later, on 18 July 2020. This Regulation 2020/1043 has put parts of the GMO regulations out of action in the event of clinical trials for COVID-19. For example, no GMO authorisation is required for clinical research into the curative or preventive treatment of COVID-19.

    As a result of Regulation 2020/1043, the Dutch 'Temporary regulation deviating treatment of gene therapy licence applications in connection with the fight against COVID-19' has been deactivated.
    Regulation 2020/1043 will continue to apply as long as COVID-19 is considered a pandemic by the WHO, or as long as COVID-19 is considered an emergency within the territory of the Union notified in accordance with Decision No. 1082/2013/EU."

    My own words: This is a reason to be concerned merely for the Dutch population, but it's proof of an alarming development, apart from the fact that never before, such a change of law is made. I've received this information from Maria Louise Genet, a Dutch lawyer, who has published her study-results, and who was invited by another Dutch lawyer to present her views. The interview is in Dutch, now deleted by YouTube. I've experienced for the very 1st time, that a video in my YouTube channel was deleted by YouTube. For one week I was unable to upload content. It needs to be in sync with the facts, rules and theories published by the WHO. That's the argument I received, explaining the reason of my video's removal.

    Please make up your own mind, before someone else does it for you, but not in your interest always? Good health to you, be safe.

  3. Wait a minute! If they stop the rollout of these poisons Bill and the boys won’t make billions while killing off thousands. He would have paid out millions in bribes to the WHO and every high level Politician world wide who fell into LOCKSTEP with their program. Please, before you Doctors actually do your job and follow your oath as Doctors remember who runs the organizations you swear allegiance to.
    Oh wait that was sarcasm. The truth is you a$$holes went right along with a program that 90% of you knew was a failure from the get go. If you did not then you are the worst kind of scum. Too lazy to spend 5 minutes researching mRNA vaccines and their 100% failure rate. The truth is you have failed as Doctors and as basic human beings and should be brought up on charges and prosecuted. The Medical establishment much like the Political one needs to be torn down and reimagined.
    The problem with this world is the creatures that end up in charge of every organization will gladly sell their soul for a few shekels while turning a blind eye to murder.

    • Well done I agree 100% with what you just said and am sick of the poor souls who took that jag because they trusted the NHS or their family doctor being called stupid B's and sheeple. These people are innocent victims of a crime against humanity that was long planned. The perpetrators of it are the stupid B's what on earth can be in the heads of these people responsible for wanting 7 billion people dead. You have just said exactly what we are all thinking dear gJ. I know I could never turn a blind eye to murder or corruption no decent person could there is zero excuse for it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here