From beforeitsnews.com:

I am so scared by this my brain is jamming and I am not coding right. I am fixing the coding errors now. Download from original source

THE ELITE HAVE ALREADY FFED OFF TO THEIR HIDEOUTS, THEY HAVE RELEASED THE GENOCIDE READ IT AND WEEP, WE ARE EFFED. PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UNVACCINATED Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:

1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.

2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:

A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.

This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure

“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”

TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.

THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.

Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.

Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.

Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:

Terms:

Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

____

If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?

____

That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).

* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.

* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:

* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;

* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.

8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.

Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:

An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.

My comment: This is why we have green screen Biden. They are ALL green screen now, we just caught Biden. They are green screen and working from sets because they have opened pandora’s box and intend to hide out until everything is finished. This is why many people are claiming the white house is empty and that they are working from a set ad are not actually there. Because they are not there. If they do ever go on camera, they are not where they say they are.

India is having their disaster happen now because they started with the vaxxes first, and have more people vaxxed than any other country.

Source: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

11 COMMENTS

  1. After some pondering about the news that spike proteins are shedding, jumping from vaccinated people to non-vaccinated people. Think about the enormous pushing of global citizens to take a vaccination, at least, in the UK, the US, and the Netherlands, that I know of.
    To my logic, it doesn't make sense to push this agenda of vaccination on all of us.

    Imagine, when this story of shedding spike proteins was true, there's no need to make sure we all need a needle in our arm. For this shedding would do the job of creating the effect that is intended.
    Only a percentage of vaccinated people would create the infestation that is intended, see what I mean? There's another post here, explaining the effect of spike proteins, with a link to this article:
    https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=171633

  2. Another thing missing in this post, is the identity of the writer, and what puzzles me is that this anonymous writer, in the first part of this post, says "This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English" I can't see why translation to English should be necessary, for I've found the documentation online in English. I've read other reports of Pfizer BioNTech.
    The writer, with this remark, suggests that the documentation published by Pfizer BioNTech, was under his or her eyes in an another language, not in English. That's peculiar. There's little chance to verify this post in the way it's presented. For translations can alter the original text.
    At least, the entire document of Pfizer BioNTech is in one of my comments here.

  3. I can't believe that this is posted while no reference to links of Pfizer BioNTech's documentation is present. This post needs some adjustment. Here's the Pfizer document, titled "A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals"

    https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

  4. I’m done with this site. You are posting to much feared base shit! Stop focusing on the negative and start focusing on the positive! Start doing things that bring you joy and you will be amazed at how you no longer are interested in fear based things. Start living your life!

  5. Please provide the link to the Pfizer document. Otherwise we cannot verify what you have written, which we need to be able to do at times like these. It's called Due Diligence.

    • Hello Tara Zenker, here's the link to the Pfizer document. I was amazed that it wasn't included in this post. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

      Before I reply to another commenter here, repeating all the pomp and circumstance of hCaptcha protocols (I'm growing very weary of boats, planes, motorbikes, and buses 🙄)
      I leave one other remark, related to what Sunni and Done are saying in their comments. The majority of the posts is about what's NOT good, in the eyes of the writer and moderator posting it.
      With so many more alternative discussion platforms, present outside the censorship-tentacles, I'd rather see more posts about the positive things, and changes, happening in our world.

      This emphasis on what's NOT good, or alarming, keepin in mind that not all what's presented is real and true, is maybe the reason why there's so little conversation and interaction going on here at PFC. For myself, I like to pick the grain kernels between the chaff, visiting this site once a week.

      This topic, and it's the first time I read other peoples' comments about feelings that there's too much negative news in the pages here, is something I've made known to the moderators in previous years. For me, it makes me come and go, come and go.

      I've chosen to explore and investigate both the shadow- and sunny side of Life's Street, so that I understand the mechanics of reasoning and in that way can foresee future reasoning, my way of keeping the pulse. Remote viewing is a bridge too far for me, and it's possible that I use that skill without consciously knowing it. I'm weary of technical training and exercises, at my age. But simply put, I need to feel an inner calling to do or start something. At this moment I'm simplifying, life is already intense enough as it is, without the surf of the Wishing Well of Wonders, for me.

      I'm an intensely living person, which sometimes calls for the necessity of simplifying, freewheeling, letting the springtime breeze clear my brain 😉🧙‍♀️

      Hope you're safe on your journey, be well.

  6. I agree with the previous two comments. So much drama reporting here it's like watching CNN. I am unsubscribing now

  7. India actually got the vaccine the same time as everyone else. This is from BBC, which is mainstream, but every other source states the same time:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-55603620

    It may be the type of vaccines used that's causing the problems for India, as India is using different kinds than the US:

    https://news.yahoo.com/india-using-two-different-covid-100008763.html

    Regarding everyone being doomed, this is exactly the kind of fear mongering Cobra mentioned that was vastly overstated. It's of course not possible to stay away from vaccinated people. I'm not happy about the increased risk or prion, but there's absolutely nothing that can be physically done to avoid this (Go live in a cave? It's already too late anyway!) so I decided to 'just chill.'

    • I agree. I was about to say the same thing. Cobra said this exact kind of thins is fear mongering. I have just had a baby and she is 3 months. Reading all this and people saying they have been affected by vaxxed individuals makes me want to stay in and not leave my home. I wasn't like this before now.

    • Hello Zach, I've spoken to the owners of a mobile shop in my neighbourhood, Indian men. One of them returned recently, from India, and chose 14 days of quarantine before entering the shop again. I've asked them how the conditions in India are.

      They informed me that things aren't good, but not dramatically disastrous. They mentioned the healthcare system in India, where everyone has to pay for medical costs.

      Since many are poor, they can't afford buying oxygen bottles, and other devices used for treatment of C-19. That seems to be the real problem, according to these Indian men.

      On the positive side, many patients in India recover from C-19, due to knowledge of natural remedies. Watch this, please:

      PANDEMIC DEATH RATES BY COUNTRY
      A summary from Wikipedia, with the percentages of fatalities for 100,000 people per country summarized. April 27, 2021:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country

      My own words:
      This Wikipedia overview shows how important it is to know the big picture. The total of percentages per country is 365.5%. Over a total of 179 countries (in this list) the percentage is average, worldwide 179 : 365.5 = 0.489%. The percentage of fatalities on 100,000 people worldwide.

      While in the news India is mentioned as in a troubling state, it is good to keep an eye on how much the percentage of people actually die. India has great knowledge of natural medicines. India is low on the list, published by Wikipedia, with a rate of 1.1% in 100,000 people, meaning many flu cases are recovering.

      The panic level per country is also proportional to how things are perceived and managed. That depends on the form of government per country, the supervision there.

      The Netherlands has a percentage of 1.2% and England 2.9%.Yemen has the highest percentage 19.49% and Singapore the lowest percentage 0.05%

      What is the relationship between influenza, the annual winter flu, and COVID-19?

      According to the John Hopkins Institute:
      COVID-19: An estimated 3,138,173 deaths worldwide (up to April 28, 2021)
      Flu: The World Health Organization estimates that between 290,000 and 650,000 people die each year from flu-related symptoms. This also includes the annual influenza.

      Https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-disease-2019-vs-the-flu

  8. I'm kinda shocked that PFC would post this without the link to the full document. Since all the guy posted was literally definitions to terms. Sharing the real information being kept from us, totally okay with, but the fear mongering needs to stop.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here