EN
FR
From Dr. Mercola’s site:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
At this point, there is simply no question. The COVID shots are an abysmal failure in
every way possible. Again and again, data analyses from around the world show a
negative correlation between “vaccination” rates and worsening infection rates and
other health trends.
The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
British data show the COVID shots are an abysmal failure, as COVID infection rates in the
U.K. are higher among the “fully vaccinated” in all adult cohorts
Infection rates are also rising faster among the fully vaxxed than in unvaccinated cohorts
of all ages. All in all, these data prove that vaccine passports and mandates are
completely pointless
Data from Scotland show more of the same. Double-jabbed Scots are more likely to be
admitted to the hospital for COVID than unvaccinated. Since Omicron became dominant,
COVID case rates are also lower among the unvaccinated than among the single-,
double- and even triple-jabbed
Internationally, journalists are now starting to try to switch the narrative away from cases,
hospitalizations and deaths by pointing out how unreliable these data are. What they
don’t admit is that “dangerous misinformants” have highlighted these problems for two
years already
Omicron is blowing huge holes in the pandemic narrative, as it predominantly affects the
vaxxed, thus proving mandates and vaccine passports are irrational and useless
There’s No Rationale for Passports and Mandates
Among the latest data sets to show this are ocial statistics from the U.K. government.
Its “National Flu and COVID-19 Surveillance Report: 13 January 2022 (Week 2)” shows
COVID infection rates in the U.K. are higher among the “fully vaccinated” in all adult
cohorts.
Infection growth rates are also rising faster among the fully vaxxed than in unvaccinated
cohorts of all ages. All in all, these data prove that vaccine passports and mandates are
completely pointless and nothing more than a coercion tool. In no way do they reduce
infection rates, hospitalizations or deaths from COVID.
Regardless of how many shots a person has received, they’re still getting infected and
transmitting it. Plus, we know the jabbed are veritable incubators for mutating strains.
Everything about this mass vaccination campaign is detrimental to public health.
Far Higher Infection Rates Among the Fully Jabbed
Using U.K. government data, a Twitter user named Don Wolt created a series of helpful
graphs that he posted January 16, 2022. The graph below shows the differences in
infection rates by age and vaccination status, and it is really telling.
Across the board, with the exception perhaps of the 80+ age group, the fully jabbed have
signicantly higher rates of COVID infection, completely decimating the myth that we’re
in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” Clearly, that is not the case.
“ … case rates have been lower in unvaccinated
individuals than the single, double, or even triple-
jabbed since Omicron became the dominant variant in
Scotland. ~ The Herald”
(Wolt claries that each bar in this graph represents four weeks of data, obtained from
successive weekly U.K. HSA reports, and the chart illustrates the rates of infection —
i.e., the number of infections per 100,000 people — not absolute numbers. “Vaxxed 2-
doses” also includes those who have received a third booster.)
Infection Rates Rising Faster Among Fully Jabbed
In another graph, you can clearly see how infection rates are also rising faster in fully
jabbed cohorts than in the unvaccinated — and this is not a result of higher vaccination
rates.
Here, Wolt determined the growth of the infection rate for each age cohort by comparing
the data of Week 1 against Week 2 in the surveillance report. As you can see by the
orange graph bars, the growth rate of infection among the unvaccinated is relatively at
across age groups, whereas the infection growth rate among the fully jabbed keeps
trending upward with age.
As noted by Wolt, this infection growth rate increase is not due to a tandem increase in
the number of people getting a second or third jab. The data show that the greater an
age cohort’s vaccination rate is, the higher its infection growth rate (i.e., the rate of
increase from one week to the next).
Risk of Death Is Extremely Low in Under-50 Age Groups
The January 13, 2022, U.K. COVID surveillance report does show that, among those
aged 50 and over, the COVID shots appear to lower hospitalization rates and death.
However, anyone under the age of 50 who tests positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection still
has an exceptionally low risk of hospitalization or death, regardless of vaccination
status. In those under the age of 30, the risk of being hospitalized or dying from COVID
is “effectively zero,” Wolt notes, which, again, “makes mandated vaccination utterly
unwarranted.”
Responding to detractors who point out that the report warns its raw data cannot be
used to estimate vaccine effectiveness, Wolt points out that his graphs are not meant to
illustrate vaccine effectiveness per se. They merely show rate trends between
“vaccinated” and unvaccinated, and these trends clearly invalidate any perceived need
for vaccine mandates. Data from Scotland show more of the same. As reported by The
Herald, January 13, 2022:
“Double-jabbed Scots are now more likely to be admitted to hospital with COVID
than the unvaccinated amid an increase in elderly people falling ill due to
waning immunity.
It comes amid ‘weird’ data showing that case rates have been lower in
unvaccinated individuals than the single, double, or even triple-jabbed since
Omicron became the dominant variant in Scotland.”
Omicron Forces Media to Rethink What They Report
The COVID pandemic has been all about social engineering, which of course cannot be
done without the full complicity of the mainstream media. In a roundabout way, a
January 12, 2022, AP News article admits this role:
“For two years, coronavirus case counts and hospitalizations have been widely
used barometers of the pandemic’s march across the world. But the omicron
wave is making a mess of the usual statistics, forcing news organizations to
rethink the way they report such gures.
‘It’s just a data disaster,’ said Katherine Wu, staff writer who covers COVID-19
for The Atlantic magazine. The number of case counts soared over the holidays,
an expected development given the emergence of a variant more transmissible
than its predecessors.
Yet these counts only reect what is reported by health authorities. They do not
include most people who test themselves at home, or are infected without even
knowing about it. Holidays and weekends also lead to lags in reported cases.
If you could add all those numbers up — and you can’t — case counts would
likely be substantially higher. For that reason, The Associated Press recently
told its editors and reporters to avoid emphasizing case counts … Many news
organizations are debating how best to use statistics now during the Omicron
surge …
Hospitalizations and death rates are considered by some to be a more reliable
picture of COVID-19’s current impact on society. Yet even the usefulness of
those numbers has been called into question in recent days. In many cases,
hospitalizations are incidental: there are people being admitted for other
reasons and are surprised to nd they test positive for COVID.”
Narrative Switch Aimed at Hiding Failures
For those who have been “awake” to the censorship and misleading reporting over thepast two years, this attempt at steering the narrative in a new direction is just laughable.
How could the AP possibly have missed the fact that it’s been a data disaster from the
start? And intentionally so? Case counts were always unreliable, considering the PCR
test cannot diagnose an active infection, and excessive cycle thresholds guaranteed
ridiculous amounts of false positives.
COVID hospitalization data were always unreliable, because anyone who tested positive
for COVID was counted as a COVID hospitalization whether they were symptomatic or
not. Nothing has changed in that regard.
The only thing that has changed is that now media are admitting it — pretending that
this is a brand-new development, of course. The same goes for COVID death counts.
They were vastly overcounted from the start, again, because of the reliance on faulty
PCR testing.
Media now claim to be moving away from “unreliable” data such as case counts,
hospitalizations and even deaths, and for all the reasons we’ve been highlighting for the
past two years. For those who have paid attention all along, this is clearly an attempt to
change the narrative without losing all credibility (which I think is near-impossible at this
point).
The fact is that Omicron is making the holes in the narrative so much bigger, it’s all
falling apart. They’re completely losing the rationale for vaccine passports and
mandates for work, school and social events, as the higher the vaccination rate, the
higher the infection rate.
To that end, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced January 19, 2022, that he
was ending all remaining COVID restrictions in England, including mask mandates on
public transportation and in schools, as well as vaccine passport requirements for
public events.
This is the complete opposite of what the technocrats need in order to justify passports
and mandates. To hide, as best as possible, this narrative-killing trend, media are now
“explaining” why they won’t be discussing case counts or even hospitalizations or death
rates anymore
If they were, they’d have to admit that the pandemic response is resulting in an ever-
growing disaster. So, don’t be surprised if fact checkers start debunking statistics
proving what a disastrous failure the shots are by saying the data on cases,
hospitalizations and deaths are simply too unreliable to use anymore.
New Narrative Doesn’t Make Sense Either
The new narrative, according to AP News, will highlight things like hospitals running
over capacity and general staff shortages.
The problem is, those don’t paint a true picture of COVID’s impact either, because
hospitals have furloughed staff due to lack of patients (many have forgone routine
medical treatments for fear of COVID), they’ve red staff for not getting the jab, other
staff have simply quit their jobs in the face of vaccine mandates and hospitals have shut
down entire wings due to these staff cuts.
Of course, if patients start returning, they might rapidly nd themselves with more
patients than they can currently handle. What else can you expect when hospitals
intentionally make these kinds of cuts?
General staff shortages in other industries are an equally awed barometer of COVID’s
impact. Many are still getting federal assistance and therefore don’t want to reenter the
work force. Others are forced out due to vaccine mandates.
Others are too sick to work thanks to COVID jab injuries. As recently reported by
OneAmerica, a national mutual life insurance company based in Indianapolis, in
addition to a 40% increase in deaths among working age Americans (and they’re not
dying from COVID), there’s also been a noticeable uptick in short-term and long-term
disability claims in the third quarter of 2021 compared to prepandemic levels.
Working age Americans are getting too sick to work, and are dying at unprecedented
levels, and it’s not because of COVID infection.
‘We Failed,’ Danish Media Admit
The same attempt at switching the narrative can be seen in other countries. Danish
media recently admitted they’ve failed the public by being “almost hypnotically
preoccupied with the daily corona counts.” “We, the press, must … take count of our
own efforts,” Danish journalist Brian Weichardt writes, “And we’ve failed.”
Weichardt admits that journalists failed to ask authorities for clear answers as to “what
it meant in concrete terms that people are hospitalized with corona and not because of
corona.” He also admits that this “makes a difference.” This, again, is precisely what
many of us have been saying for the past two years, and all we got for the effort was a
domestic terrorist label.
Weichardt, in this piece, tries to shift the blame from journalists to the authorities
themselves. They’re to blame, he thinks. “The messages of the authorities and
politicians to the people of this historic crisis leave much to be desired,” he writes,
ignoring the fact that a journalist’s No. 1 duty is to actually investigate, to double-check
and to question, and not simply act as a two-legged parrot.
For two years straight, any dissenting opinion has been labeled as dangerous
misinformation, even when completely accurate, because that’s how propaganda works.
The fact that press members are now starting to backtrack in order to save what little
credibility they have left does not change the fact that they have, nearly universally,
acted as promoters of propaganda and nothing else.
Now that a majority of people are onto their spiel, they’re trying to pretend as though it
were all a genuine mistake. Nice try. Let’s see how these pharma-backed propaganda
jockeys fare when it comes to reporting the truth about COVID jab injuries. That will be
where the rubber meets the road in terms of regaining credibility, as it will force them to
bite the hand that feeds them — the drug industry.
The sad truth is, we’re likely facing an avalanche of serious chronic ailments going
forward, among them, neurodegenerative diseases, as detailed by Stephanie Seneff,
Ph.D., in her article “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Neurodegenerative Disease.” A short
summation of this article reads as follows:
“There are many reasons to be wary of the COVID-19 vaccines, which have been
rushed to market with grossly inadequate evaluation and aggressively
promoted to an uninformed public, with the potential for huge, irreversible,
negative consequences.
One potential consequence is to exhaust the nite supply of progenitor B cells
in the bone marrow early in life, causing an inability to mount new antibodies to
infectious agents. An even more worrisome possibility is that these vaccines,
both the mRNA vaccines and the DNA vector vaccines, may be a pathway to
crippling disease sometime in the future.
Through the prion-like action of the spike protein, we will likely see an alarming
increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s
disease, CKD, ALS and Alzheimer’s, and these diseases will show up with
increasing prevalence among younger and younger populations, in years to
come.
Unfortunately, we won’t know whether the vaccines caused this increase,
because there will usually be a long time separation between the vaccination
event and the disease diagnosis.
Very convenient for the vaccine manufacturers, who stand to make huge prots
off of our misfortunes — both from the sale of the vaccines themselves and
from the large medical cost of treating all these debilitating diseases.”
Sources and References
Gov.uk National Flu and COVID-19 Surveillance Reports: 2021 to 2022 Season, Surveillance Report for
January 13, 2022, Week 2
Twitter Don Wolt January 16, 2022
The Herald January 13, 2022
AP News January 12, 2022
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.
