SCOTUS to reconsider hearing case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored 2020 fraud, broke oaths

By Natalia Mittelstadt of

A “rigged election” is equivalent to war since both “put into power” a “victor,” argues plaintiff, and therefore allegations of a rigged election must be investigated.

The Supreme Court is set to reconsider whether to hear a lawsuit alleging President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election before certifying Biden as the victor on Jan. 6, 2021, allowing for Biden and Harris to be “fraudulently” inaugurated.

The plaintiff, Raland J. Brunson, seeks the defendants’ removal from office for violating their oaths.

After the Supreme Court declined on Jan. 9 to hear Brunson’s lawsuit, he filed a petition for reconsideration on Jan. 23. On Feb. 1, the court scheduled the private conference for reconsidering the petition on Friday, when four of the nine justices must vote to grant the case a hearing for it to move forward.

File  20230126114616761_rehearing 22-380.pdf

Brunson, who is representing himself in the case, originally filed the lawsuitBrunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al, on June 21, 2021 in Utah’s 2nd District Court. In August 2021, the case was moved from the state court to the U.S. District Court in Utah. After that court ruled against Brunson in February 2022, he appealed to the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Before a decision was rendered by the 10th Circuit, Brunson realized he could bypass the appeals court and go straight to the Supreme Court by invoking the high court’s Rule 11. Under the rule, a case pending before the appeals court may bypass that court’s decision and go to the Supreme Court if it “is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.” The Supreme Court received Brunson’s petition in September 2022.

In his petition for reconsideration, Brunson argues that there must be a penalty for violating oaths of office or else they are “not binding.”

A “rigged election” is equivalent to war since both “put into power” a “victor,” he argues, and therefore allegations of “a rigged election” must be investigated.

“The Oath of Office requires that aid and comfort cannot be given to those levying war through a rigged election,” Brunson writes.

As a “Presidential rigged election is a threat to the Constitution,” he argues, “when members of Congress become aware of such allegations an investigation into these allegations is required or they become violators of their Oath of Office.”

“If a person who takes the Oath of Office owes allegiance to the United States,” Brunson continues, and the U.S. code regarding treason “states that whoever owing such allegiance violates this allegiance shall be incapable of holding office, then wouldn’t it be fitting that they shall be removed from office as well?”

Since his complaint alleges a serious national security breach that is an act of war and holds that “it requires an act on an emergency level to repair this breach immediately — to stop this war, and that those perpetrators of this breach are the respondents,” he writes, “doesn’t this Court have the power to adjudicate these serious claims and to immediately end the conflict and fix the national security breach?”

Brunson’s prior filing in the federal district court case noted that members of Congress had requested an investigation into the election. On Jan. 2, 2021, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), along with 10 other senators, requested “an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states.” A total of 147 Republican lawmakers objected to the certification of the election on Jan. 6.

For those who suspected, watched, and have been patiently waiting, this could be good news. But don’t hold your breath!

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

Previous articleCalifornia’s Predicted Fiscal Firestorm Has Arrived
Next articleDr. Tim Spector Exposes Entire Food Industry
I've been interested in all things related to metaphysics, parapsychology, spirituality and anything related to space since childhood. I'm the kid who used to let the Jehova Witness and Mormans into the house so I could ask a million questions. I've always wanted to be of service and ended up working as an EMT and later in law enforcement. A family job transfer lead me to Washington State for 5 years where I went back to studying spiritual phenomenon and meeting some fascinating people. I've had several initiations, was taught energy healing and became certified in Reiki III over the final 3 years. I had a larger awakening and understanding of how it Reiki worked, remote sensing and more after returning to CA in 2001. I love researching and now writing and being a spokesperson for benevolent contact with NHIB through the practice of meditation. I experienced a spontaneous healing and not long after the "quickening" of 12/21/2012, began having more paranormal experiences, including seeing the UFOs, and orbs that fly over at night. I'm also a volunteer /Admin for ETLetsTalk and love teaching others how to make that connection that I know will one day lead us out of the darkness and into a brighter future.


  1. Just a matter of time before this is fixed and the true winner of the 2020 election, Donald J Trump will be well known as the winner. Tick tock!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here