AI model to explore effects of chemtrails is released but The Guardian says chemtrails is just a “conspiracy theory”

Before the UK general elections, The Guardian published an article accusing members of Reform UK  of promoting “conspiracy theories.”  One such “theory” was chemtrails.

Embarrassingly for The Guardian, just a couple of months later a global leader in artificial intelligence released a chemtrail emulator, an online tool, that anyone can use to see the effects of chemtrails.

For those of us who don’t follow The Guardian’s corporate narrative, believe what our own eyes are seeing and have researched for ourselves, we know chemtrails are not a theory, they are a fact.  And that there are widespread attempts to keep chemtrail operations hidden from the public, including by those pulling the strings at The Guardian, makes it a conspiracy.

Two months ago, AI pioneer Andrew Ng released a simple online tool that allows anyone to tinker with the dials of a solar geoengineering model, exploring what “might happen” if nations “attempt” to counteract climate change by spraying reflective particles into the atmosphere.

Andrew Ng is a globally recognised leader in artificial intelligence (“AI”). He is the founder of DeepLearning.AI, founder and CEO of Landing AI, general partner at AI Fund, chairman and co-founder of Coursera and an adjunct professor at Stanford University’s Computer Science Department.

Ng’s online tool aims to explore a climate engineering technique called stratospheric aerosol injection (“SAI”).

Geoengineering Global describes SAI as “a solar radiation management (SRM) geoengineering or climate engineering approach that uses tiny reflective particles or aerosols to reflect sunlight into space in order to cool the planet and reverse or stop Global Warming. The approach involves spraying reflective sulphate aerosol particles into the stratosphere with high altitude airplanes, tethered balloons, high-altitude blimps or artillery.”

Another term for SAI is solar geoengineering.

“The concept of solar geoengineering was born from the realisation that the planet has cooled after massive volcanic eruptions. But critics fear that deliberately releasing such materials could harm certain regions of the world, discourage efforts to cut greenhouse-gas emissions, or spark conflicts between nations, among other bad outcomes,” MIT Technology Review reported.

MIT goes on to say, “The goal of Ng’s emulator, called Planet Parasol, is to invite more people to think about solar geoengineering, explore the potential trade-offs involved in such interventions, and use the results to discuss and debate our options for climate action.”

Ng posted the announcement about Planet Parasol on LinkedIn.  One of the responses to Ng’s post sums up what many of us think:

As did a couple of others.

Not a Theory

In May, two months before the UK general elections, The Guardian published an article titled ‘Covid, chemtrails and climate: the wild ideas spread by Reform UK candidates’.

“Some of the most senior prospective parliamentary candidates (PPCs) of Reform, the right-wing populist party, have been found to have posted conspiracy theories and other fringe views online. Yet, far from distancing itself, the party has backed them,” The Guardian wrote and then listed seven “conspiracy theories and other fringe views.”

If you read the list The Guardian compiled, you’d be hard-pressed to find one that isn’t true, which makes The Guardian appear a little too desperate to denigrate those not politically aligned with their views.

One of the “conspiracy theories” listed was related to chemtrails. “Andrea Whitehead … posted memes online promoting the chemtrail conspiracy theory,” The Guardian, a notorious purveyor of disinformation and propaganda, said.

However, embarrassingly for The Guardian, Andrew Ng, a Stanford professor of computer science, does not see chemtrails as a “conspiracy theory.” In fact, he takes it quite seriously. It is for the sole reason of emulating the effects of SAI, which includes chemtrails, that Ng made Planet Parasol publicly available about two months after The Guardian’s article.

Although it is claimed that Ng’s model emulates what “might happen” if nations “attempt” to use chemtrails, how could he know what to program into his model if he didn’t have access to real-world data? The answer is he can’t. You cannot build a model such as Planet Parasol without first inputting data. So, where did Ng get the data? If Ng’s online tool is even remotely realistic, then he has access to at least some data from chemtrail operations. If Ng’s Planet Parasol was built using no real-world data, then it has no basis in reality and is little better than a computer game.

SAI using aeroplanes, the spraying of particulates or chemicals into the atmosphere from aeroplanes, is colloquially known as chemtrails.  Chemtrails are not a proposed or theoretical geoengineering strategy that “might happen,” nor can they be brushed off as a so-called “conspiracy theory.”  Chemtrails is a strategy that has already been deployed across the globe for decades.  Chemtrails are not a theory, they are a fact.  And they are also not a “fringe view.”

Geoengineering Watch, a website and organisation dedicated to exposing and combating climate engineering, has so far had over 47.7 million visitors.  This is only one of the websites or groups that are gathering research and evidence on chemtrails. And, many more people across the world are looking up at the skies and noticing the persistent streaks emitting from aircraft; streaks that dissipate to form unnatural-looking clouds or cause a “white out” in our skies.

Geoengineering Watch’s lead researcher Dane Wiginton has been investigating geoengineering techniques and the effects they are having on the environment and all life forms, including humans, for many years.  In the short video below from six years ago, he explains what geoengineering entails and some of the catastrophic effects the practice is having on our world.

Who Owns The Guardian

So why did The Guardian lie so blatantly?  To understand whose message The Guardian is spreading, taking a look into who can influence what it publishes is a good place to start.  One of the groups of people who will influence an outlet’s messaging is those who own it.

The Guardian Media Group, which owns The Guardian and The Observer, is owned by the British company The Scott Trust Limited.

It is claimed that the trust’s ownership structure ensures that any financial gains go into journalism rather than shareholders’ pockets, prioritising the independence and integrity of The Guardian’s reporting.

However, as Wikispooks notes: “Scott Trust Ltd is controlled by people predominantly from banking, venture capital and marketing which perhaps explains The Guardian‘s well-documented expertise in offshore tax avoidance schemes.”

In 2015, award-winning British journalist Jonathan Cook published an article on his blog titled ‘HSBC and the sham of Guardian’s Scott Trust’.

“Britain, we are told, is privileged to have two ‘liberal’ media outlets, the BBC and The Guardian,” he wrote. He continued:

Occasionally, it is also claimed that Britain’s media regulator, Ofcom, is there to prevent bias, ensuring that minimum standards of objectivity are maintained in news coverage … Here are three illuminating articles and a short video that should help to dispel any such illusions about a healthy and diverse British media. Rather, the media in the UK is embedded in the corporate world, and therefore incapable of fulfilling its self-declared role as watchdog against abuses by the powerful.

In addition to the three resources, Cook described an “even more important” article by Nafeez Ahmed. “[His] latest lengthy, wide-ranging and crowd-funded investigation into how the HSBC bank and the City [of London] are deeply implicated in money-laundering the proceeds of globalised crime, and how that same financial sector has captured not only Britain’s political elites but also the entire British media. Yes, the entire media, including The Guardian,”  Cook said.

If it is now as it was in 2015, we can assume that the financial sector which is deeply implicated in laundering proceeds from globalised crime doesn’t like Reform UK.  Nor do they want us to question the man-made streaks and clouds that appear in our skies as a result of chemtrail operations.

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.