A federal court has ruled against agribiz giant Monsanto in a second case, finding the company’s popular weed killer, Roundup, was responsible for a California farmer’s cancer. The case paves the way for the settlement of tens of thousands of similar pending cases.
A jury in the US District Court for the Northern District of California found on Tuesday that Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup was, more likely than not, a “substantial factor” in 70-year-old Sonoma County farmer Edwin Hardeman’s cancer.
Hardeman told the court he used the herbicide for decades to kill poison oak, a rash-causing vine, on his 56-acre farm, often inhaling the fumes after they’d been sprayed and feeling the chemical on his hands, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. A pathologist also testified that Roundup was the most likely cause of his illness.
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is a cancer that targets white blood cells, the body’s primary defense forces. Hardeman’s is in remission. However, that was not the case for another California farmer, 46-year-old DeWayne Johnson, who testified last summer that his terminal cancer, also non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, had been caused by decades of use of Roundup at his work as a groundskeeper, Sputnik reported.
The San Francisco court ruled in Johnson’s favor last August, ultimately awarding him $78.5 million in damages and saying Monsanto “acted with malice, oppression or fraud” by not adequately warning customers about the carcinogenic dangers of its products, “and should be punished for its conduct.”
Multiple national and international agencies have identified Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, as a probable cause of cancer in humans, including the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is an arm of the World Health Organization, and the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
The Chronicle notes that Hardeman’s case is one of three “bellwether” trials that will establish guidelines for the settlement of 760 other cases against Monsanto around the country that have been transferred to US District Judge Vince Chhabria’s court in San Francisco, as well as another 10,000 pending cases elsewhere.
The jury will return on Wednesday to decide if Monsanto shall award Hardeman damage payments, and if so, how much.
Monsanto was also the manufacturer, along with Dow Chemical, of the notorious defoliant chemical dubbed “Agent Orange” sprayed by US forces during the Vietnam War to destroy forest areas and deny Vietnamese forces the cover of foliage. Aside from the massive environmental destruction wrought by the air spraying of 19 million gallons of the chemical in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia from 1961 to 1971, 4.8 million Vietnamese were exposed to the chemical, and at least 400,000 died because of it, according to the Red Cross of Vietnam. In the 1980s, the US paid out-of-court settlements to roughly 50,000 US Vietnam War veterans injured by the chemical, to the tune of $180 million, according to the New York Times.
Sputnik reported last October that cost of US government-sponsored cleanup of heavily sprayed areas in Vietnam, which was then wrapping up, also totaled in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.