Huge COVID Case-counting Deception at the CDC

by Jon Rappoport at nomorefakenews and humansarefree.com.

For this piece, we have to enter the official world (of the insane) — where everyone is quite sure a new coronavirus was discovered in China and the worthless diagnostic tests mean something and the case numbers are real and meaningful.

Once we execute all those absurd maneuvers, we land square in the middle of yet another scandal — this time at our favorite US agency for scandals, the CDC.

The Atlantic, May 21, has the story, headlined, “How could the CDC make that mistake?”I’ll give you the key quotes, and then comment on the stark inference The Atlantic somehow failed to grasp.

“We’ve learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus…

“The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral [PCR] and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.”

“Several states — including Pennsylvania, the site of one of the country’s largest outbreaks, as well as Texas, Georgia, and Vermont — are blending the data in the same way.

“Virginia likewise mixed viral and antibody test results until last week, but it reversed course and the governor apologized for the practice after it was covered by the Richmond Times-Dispatch and The Atlantic.

“Maine similarly separated its data on Wednesday; Vermont authorities claimed they didn’t even know they were doing this.”

“’You’ve got to be kidding me,’ Ashish Jha, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told us when we described what the CDC was doing. ‘How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess’.”

“The CDC stopped publishing anything resembling a complete database of daily [COVID] test results on February 29. When it resumed publishing test data last week [the middle of May]…”

First of all, the CDC’s basic mission is publishing disease statistics on an ongoing basis. Reporting partial data flies in the face of what they’re supposed to be all about.

But the big deal, of course, is combining results from two different tests—the PCR and the antibody—and placing them in one lump.

I’ve read the Atlantic article forwards, backwards, and sideways, and it appears the experts believe only PCR viral tests should be used to count the number of COVID cases.

So here is a takeaway I find nowhere in the Atlantic article: COMBINING THE TWO TESTS WILL VASTLY INFLATE THE NUMBER OF CASES.

I’m not talking about categories like “rate of infection” or “percentage.” I’m talking about plain numbers of cases.

Some PCR tests will indicate COVID and some antibody tests will indicate COVID, and adding them together will pump up the number of cases. You know, that big number they flash on TV screens a hundred times a day.

“Coronavirus cases jumped up again yesterday, and the grand total in the US is now…”

THAT number.

The number media and government and related con artists deploy to scare the people and justify lockdowns and use to stop reopening the economy.

The brass band circus with flying acrobats and elephants and clown numbers.

Therefore, I’m not characterizing what the CDC is doing as a mistake. They’ve managed to create the illusion that absolute case numbers are higher than they should be.

Somehow, these “mistakes” always seem to result in worse news, not better news. The “errors” are always on the high side rather than the low side.

Case in point: the computer prediction of COVID deaths in the UK and US made by that abject failure, Neil Ferguson, whose track record, going back to 2001, has been one horrendous lunatic exaggeration after another.

His 2020 projections of 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK and two million in the US were directly used to justify lockdowns in many countries.

The CDC, back in 2009, stopped reporting the number of Swine Flu cases in the US—while still claiming that number was in the tens of thousands.

I’ve written in great detail about the scandal, which was exposed by then-CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson.

The CDC stopped counting cases, because the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples from patients was coming back from labs with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

And yet, in a later retrospective “analysis,” the CDC claimed that, at the height of the “epidemic,” there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

Going all the way back to 2003 and SARS, the CDC and other public health agencies around the world hyped the dangers to the sky; the final official death count, globally, when the dust cleared? 800.

There is a tradition of lying on the high side, blowing up figures in order to create the illusion of destruction.

CDC? Mistake? The agency is certainly incompetent. But that’s just the beginning of the story.

The only time they say there is no danger is when they’re lying about the effects of vaccines.

My headline for the Atlantic article would read: SO HOW MANY COVID CASES SHOULD WE SUBTRACT TO GET THE ACTUAL NUMBER?

And the first paragraph would go this way:

“Just when governors are trying to reopen their economies, a gigantic case-counting deception at the CDC is taking the wind out of their sails.

“The millions of Americans suffering financial devastation could be pushed back into a hole. Who is screaming to high heaven about THAT on the nightly news? No one. Why not?”

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

4 thoughts on “Huge COVID Case-counting Deception at the CDC”

  1. It seems to be on the top of the deception-agenda, that numbers of COVID-19 cases are
    consistently kept as alarmingly high as possible. If I’ve understood correctly, the ways to achieve this are:

    1. Any patient with infectious symptoms, arriving in a hospital is diagnosed with COVID-19. The test isn’t visualizing the virus, it looks for pathogens. These are always present in our body, only not to the extent that we’re getting sick always. But as soon as the immune system weakens, due to fear, a bad health condition plus an infection, as a result, the body contains more pathogens, showing symptoms of illness and voila… upon arriving in the hospital, a test is done and a COVID-19 patient is invented.

    2. In the panic and work-pressure when the pandemic was declared by the WHO, on March 11th, patients with symptoms that were look-a-likes of the COVID-19 symptoms, were placed in the quarantined COVID_19 part of the hospitals, without testing.
    When they arrived without being contaminated by COVID-19, they certainly were upon arrival. Not even by their own doing, or after being tested and “made” such a patient, but by being treated as a COVID-19 patient, with all the pomp and circumstance of medication, a ventilator attached to them, after being put to sleep for a few weeks.
    How to kill a human being? seems to be on the agenda, for sure.

    Only an assertive patient, a man arriving with breathing problems in Elm’s Court Hospital, who was a patient of the nurse who has recorded conversations and scenes during her work, in that same hospital, was wise enough to refuse the ventilator treatment, which saved his life, said this nurse in an interview afterwards. He was a user, probably informed enough to not be fooled.

    3. Another example of a deliberate attempt to see the number of COVID-19 patients soaring, is a Scottish strategy, to start testing as much as possible, was debunked by
    the British government:
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2247462-scotland-could-eliminate-the-coronavirus-if-it-werent-for-england/
    “When Kate Mark at the National Health Service Lothian in Edinburgh realised that suspected cases were increasing, her team began testing people in their homes and set up one of the world’s first drive-through testing centres.

    But on 12 March, the UK government abandoned all community testing efforts to focus on testing in hospitals and other healthcare settings, due to a lack of resources. From then on, the disease spread fast until, on 23 March, prime minister Boris Johnson announced a lockdown across the UK.

    This wasn’t soon enough to prevent waves of deaths in care homes in Scotland and England. In both nations, protecting social care had been deprioritised in favour of healthcare.” See where the weak part of the safety belt is present?

    It’s dark humour to me, to find the same sort of description, in this article, of this worldwide pandemonium, that I’m using at times: “The brass band circus with flying acrobats and elephants and clown numbers.”

    To me, the evidence of this whole COVID-19 circus being an artificial invention with mimicry of dominance, with lies in nooks and corners of life worldwide, where most gullible people are running around, in hospitals and care homes, forced to shut up when they see the deception, with doctors stepping out of their job, and fearful elderly withdraw entirely in their homes just like snails in their houses, seems to be visible in this:

    When a nation doesn’t choose 100% lockdown with residents forced to stay home and all social activities coming to an end and the government allows people to walk around in the streets, in nature with their dogs, the pandemic is contained simply for the fact that, either the residents build up immunity by being exposed to the virus (that’s the logic of the Dutch government) or there’s no danger of contamination in the manner as it’s “instructed” to the world population, by the WHO. It’s still an important question, why the WHO advised President Trump to continue air-traffic between China and the US, when facts contradicted the sanity of that advice.

    The element of surprise and lack of experience worked in favour of the designers. Isn’t it true that many of us were hypnotized by the ratcatcher of Hameln! When I travelled to The Netherlands on March 11th, I expected to be quarantined in my home for an unknown period of time and I made mouth masks from cloth before I left. None were available in the chemistry of my town.

    When I arrived in my home and found out that we were allowed outside the home, for a walk and letting the dog out, or for shopping, I went to the park and picked lots of young nettle tops, preparing to store lots of dried nettles in my home. We were lucky to be in a long glorious springtime, in The Netherlands! And I bought large bags of rice as well since nothing was known or clear yet, about what was happening. How I enjoyed walking every day and the quietude in the streets and parks! The air was clean and birds sang loud.

    The decision to lock people up in their homes, like in Wuhan, for a couple of months, was accompanied by an enormous amount of disinfectants, sprayed all through the neighbourhoods. Again and again. In Italy, in the hearth of the virus-fire, quarantine was also mandatory, with neighbourhoods starting to sing on their balconies.

    The number of COVID-19 cases is nowhere accurate, it seems, for various reasons. The deception of manipulating the numbers has helped to prevent this accuracy. In Italy, they say, the healthcare and administration are chaotic, while in China all are regulated and controlled, since it’s a surveillance state with technology that is far more developed and present, compared to Italy.

    In the end, it seems that from start to end, whenever the “end” arrives, the entire pandemic and its unfolding is monitored, designed as much as contained, with fuel added to it and solutions that were shortlived, all with the purpose to keep as many of us confused and bewildered.

    For those of us who can see that design, it’s an enormously helpful realization, to have witnessed it. Those of us who are aware, need to DO something with this insight, this knowledge, so that repetition isn’t possible, or at least not successful in the long run. Let this be a marathon well performed, with strong hearts and our eyes wide open!

    Reply
  2. The good people of archive.org have saved the “One Cup – One Life” video with Mr. Keshe in its virtual vaults and its published in about 10 different languages as well. I’ve now listened to it for a couple of times and understand how to make it.

    The only part I didn’t get is how one washes off the salt. When Mr. Keshe says “wash it off” he possibly means “pour some of the content of the cup of life (with the wires attached to it) into a second cup, where you drink from and wet your mouth mask with, or fill your spray bottle, and add water to it”. Could someone who has put this into practice, inform me about this?

    If I’m right in how I understand it, shouldn’t the effect of dilution in the second cup, also dilute the effect of what’s produced in the cup of life (with the wires attached to it)?
    https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Keshe+Foundation+Spaceship+Institute%22

    Reply
    • Hi Devon. Watched the video. What I heard is you drink the clear water and leave the sediment in which you can make another cup over and over. Too bad we don’t have this being made commercially but big pharm is usually the nemesis. Also, here in US there are different reports of virus testing that reports 100% positive even if it never touched a human. People have sent to testing labs tests that were to made to look used to see what the result would be. They came back positive without touching a human.

      Reply

Leave a Comment