Shrouded in secrecy, the court case that could bring justice for covid vaccine injured

THE experimental covid vaccines injured millions, but will its chief architects be brought to justice? A civil court case in the Netherlands initiated by seven plaintiffs is shrouded in secrecy. One of its prosecuting lawyers has been arrested and a key witness ‘died unexpectedly’ earlier this year.

Peter Stassen, who specialises in European competition law, and Arno van Kessel are the Dutch lawyers prosecuting the case, which took a dramatic turn after van Kessel was arrested in June by armed police. He was reportedly blindfolded before being taken to a high-security prison where he has since been held without charge, accused of belonging to a ‘criminal network’. This prevented him attending an important hearing on July 9 that discussed jurisdiction, the merits of the case and whether the plaintiffs’ witnesses should be allowed to give evidence.

At the hearing, Stassen used strong words to accuse the high-profile defendants of ‘biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit, and assault.’ In defence, the opposing team of eight lawyers simply repeated the official ‘safe and effective’ narrative, a phrase which Stassen said has been discredited as evidenced by injury and excess mortality data.

In the UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has received reports relating to covid vaccines of nearly 3,000 deaths and 500,000 injuries, 75 per cent of which it considers serious. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) EudraVigilance data on covid vaccines shows that by 2023 more than 30,000 deaths had been reported by health professionals and nearly 10,000 by non-healthcare professionals, while more than a million serious adverse events had been reported, nearly 700,000 of them by health professionals.

The plaintiffs’ identities have been redacted and not much is known about them apart from the fact they were all fit and healthy before being vaccinated and that the original plaintiffs include four men and three women. It is known that one died in 2023 but the cause of death has not been revealed. Last month three more plaintiffs applied to join the group action, taking the total to nine.

The case was filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden, in the north of the Netherlands, in July 2023, against vaccine czar Bill Gates, whose Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is on a mission to vaccinate the world. Gates has already tried to wriggle out of the case by claiming that he was not under the jurisdiction of the Dutch court. The court decided he was and ordered him to pay €1,406 in legal costs.

Also accused are Mark Rutte, former Dutch prime minister, now Secretary General of Nato, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla, and former Dutch health minister Hugo de Jonge. Governmental and commercial organisations are accused too. They are Pfizer Inc, the State of the Netherlands, who represent the Dutch government and its public health agencies, and the Riijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM), the Dutch National Institute for Public Health. There are reportedly 17 defendants in all.

They face five main charges which are deception and misinformation, specifically ‘deliberate misinformation and concealment of risks that led citizens to receive harmful injections under false pretences’. Stassen said that the safe and effective narrative message was not appropriate for the plaintiffs who claim the jabs caused them serious physical and mental injury. It is stressed that all involved in the production of the covid vaccines must have known, or should have known, that the vaccines could potentially cause severe side effects.

Complicity in bodily harm, the claimants had no health issues before being coerced into taking the covid jabs and allege the vaccine caused them chronic physical and psychological injuries. The defendants are also accused of abuse of power and of coercion, citing coercive tactics like ‘no jab, no job’ mandates, social pressure, and general exclusion from daily life as tools to override vaccine hesitancy. The prosecution says these tactics amount to violations of human rights and of bodily autonomy.

Klaus Schwab, others at the WEF, and Bill Gates are accused of co-ordinating the agenda to implement the Great Reset. It is alleged that they used the pandemic as a vehicle for global restructuring. Stassen described the violation to the court as ‘an unprecedented crime accompanied by coercion, deception, and even murder’.

The final charge is violation of national and international law. This is based on Dutch civil and constitutional law, international human rights law and the Nuremberg Code. It is alleged that experimental treatments were administered without proper informed consent, a legal requirement in European countries according to the Council of Europe Oviedo Convention 1997.

The Oviedo Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine Act is a key international treaty that requires informed consent for any medical intervention. Article 5 states: ‘An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it.’ The European Charter of Fundamental Rights states in Article 3(2) that ‘in the fields of medicine and biology, the free and informed consent of the person concerned must be respected’.

There are exceptions that supersede these acts, put in place before the recently updated World Health Organization (WHO) ‘pandemic treaty’. These will no doubt be used by the defence, as they state that consent may be bypassed to save life or prevent serious harm, and that in rare cases, for example when trying to control contagious disease, consent may be overridden.

The prosecution will put up a good fight and have recruited six high-profile dissenting voices and whistleblowers as witnesses to support their case. Last month the defence asked the court to exclude all six, claiming the witnesses are outliers whose views are fundamentally at odds with established scientific consensus. The vaccine injured will fundamentally disagree and are incredibly grateful that the six have put their heads above the parapet.

Perhaps the highest-profile are former Pfizer vice president and respiratory pharmacology expert Dr Mike Yeadon, financial expert Catherine Austin Fitts, and former Pharma executive and clinical trial specialist Alexandra ‘Sasha’ Latypover.

Dr Yeadon says the covid-19 shots are not vaccines but are gene-therapy platforms designed to turn recipients’ cells into factories that produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein rather than offering immunity. He challenges the claim that the pandemic demanded mass vaccination and said there was no scientific justification to vaccinate healthy, low-risk individuals. He also claims the boosters are part of a mass depopulation campaign used to damage health and potentially kill.

Catherine Austin Fitts is founder and president of the Solari Report, a financial intelligence platform. She is a former Wall Street investment banker who served under the Bush administration as Assistant Secretary of Housing. She is expected to testify that Gates’s ‘philanthropic investments in vaccine technology’ are part of a broader agenda of economic control.

Sasha Latypova worked in the pharmaceutical industry for over 25 years specialising in clinical trial oversight, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) submissions and good manufacturing practices. She is expected to allege that there has been systemic fraud in regulatory approval with the irregular use of defence procurement channels.

Psychotherapist and legal activist Dr Joseph Sansone from Florida will testify that vaccines are bioweapons capable of causing serious disease and shortening lifespan, while legal researcher and journalist Katherine Watt will argue that legal structures enabled a militarised vaccine rollout.

One expert, Professor Francis Boyle, 74, died ‘unexpectedly’ in January; the cause of his death has not been made public. He was professor of international law at the University of Illinois with an extensive history defending human rights. Professor Boyle stood up against war crimes and genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina and was best known for drafting the 1989 US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act under the Bush administration. He said in an interview that covid vaccines were ‘frankenshots’, part of a plan to conduct ‘medical experimentation on humanity’.

The next ruling, in approximately six weeks, will relate to the defence’s application to exclude the expert witnesses.

Although this is not a criminal trial, the accusations are extremely serious. If found liable, the defendants could face financial penalties and go on to face criminal proceedings.

Peter Stassen would not comment on Arno van Kessel but said: ‘I will make sure that the clients’ interests are served (and the proceedings continue).’

From conservativewoman.co.uk