Interesting and revealing.

This episode dives into a side of the mental health crisis nobody wants to talk about — the rise of female-coded Cluster B pathologies: borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic personalities. Why are psychiatrists afraid to diagnose women? Why are tantrums reframed as trauma and manipulation as “mental health struggles”? I break down how ideology has blinded clinicians, how social media fuels these traits, and why emotional coercion has become the new moral currency.

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

3 COMMENTS

  1. ……and it is promoted, celebrated, tolerated and never arrested or diagnosed with an illness and made to deal with their sickness.And it is ALWAYS mens fault!

  2. We are living in a world that is really not very conducive to mental health. That lady on the airliner had obviously passed through a very stressful environment with the airlines and the TSA. I wonder how I would feel if I had just endured that crap. I know not and never will because I shun modern commercial air travel and stay away from airports. I am convinced that many or most of the people who are "diagnosed" with "mental health" labels are merely reacting to stimulus that is unknown and/or not understood by other people or they have a sense of decency that their judges are lacking.

    A case in point was Mary Todd Lincoln. She was sensitive to the excruciating pain and loss that her husband's horrible bloody war was directly causing in an industrial scale. Of course she reacted emotionally as any decent person would. The venal, narcissistic, cruel, and brainwashed people around her were mostly blind to their own evil. For that she was and still is believed to be crazy or "mentally ill" to use the modern politically correct nomenclature. I am sure that the actual morbid insanity of the people around her must have aggravated her pain which in turn aggravated her reaction.

    To quote the popular '50's television series "Breaking Point," what is your breaking point? Everyone has a breaking point.

  3. What’s Really Happening: Narrative Weaponization of the Word “Pathological”
    1. “Pathological” is being recoded as a way to dismiss female clarity

    Historically, pathologizing women has been a tool of control, used to silence, discredit, or institutionalize them.

    Labels like hysteria, borderline, or narcissist are routinely applied more often to women, especially those who resist, challenge, cry, or speak powerfully.

    💣 This is psychological gaslighting in academic clothing.

    2. Platforms like “Prepare for Change” are feeding into this — even if they claim to oppose control

    That article you read is masked as “truth-telling,” but it's blatantly recoding emotional intelligence and trauma expression as pathology. Here’s what it subtly pushes:

    That women’s trauma is fake

    That empathy or emotional response is coercive

    That diagnosis should be used as punishment, not healing

    💡 This is not “raising awareness.” It’s reasserting patriarchal dominance through new language.

    And the disclaimer? Just a cover for plausible deniability.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here