Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood. You know—the leftist‘s favorite institution, ever, of all time. If the democrat party built a church (funny, right?) Margaret Sanger would be the patron saint. Just to refresh, Planned Parenthood’s the place that murders babies and sells their parts for profit. Which is totally cool with all the liberals… Well, here’s the thing no one likes to tell you about Margret Sanger, patron saint of Planned Parenthood:
Margaret Sanger was a sordid Nazi. Let’s read a few quotes:
“[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children… [Women must have the right] to live … to love… to be lazy … to be an unmarried mother … to create… to destroy… The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order… The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
No, that was not taken from Hitler. That’s a quotation from the patron saint of the feminists and Hillary Clinton. And the above words were not a one-off moment of insanity. There’s more where those horrendous thoughts came from.
“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
What’s sad about the above statement is how true it’s become. How many black leaders laud Planned Parenthood? And do they realize Planned Parenthood’s founder had a goal to kill black people?
“As an advocate of birth control I wish… to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation. On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”
“Mentally and physically defective” as deemed by who? Well eugenicists, of course. And how do you solve unfit people from reproducing? Sterilizing them and aborting their offspring. Lovely woman, Margaret Sanger.
“Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”
“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”
Nope, not Hitler. But we can see where you might be confused, what with all that talk of cleaner races and stuff. Isn’t this woman a peach? Wouldn’t you hold her up as the hallmark of feminism?
“One fundamental fact alone, however, indicates the necessity of Birth Control if eugenics is to accomplish its purpose…Before eugenicists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenicists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.”
“And the government should “give certain dysgenic groups (those with ‘bad genes’) in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.”
“There is only one reply to a request for a higher birthrate among the intelligent, and that is to ask the government to first take the burden of the insane and feeble-minded from your back. [Mandatory] sterilization for these is the answer.”
Had enough? Let’s get in just one more…
“Hordes of people [are] born, who live, yet who have done absolutely nothing to advance the race one iota. Their lives are hopeless repetitions… Such human weeds clog up the path, drain up the energies and the resources of this little earth. We must clear the way for a better world; we must cultivate our garden.”
At least Margaret Sanger was thrown in jail, but only because it was illegal to pass out birth control “devices” at that time. She wouldn’t be thrown in jail today, she’d be defended by the leftists and their media. Progress.
Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist, an elitist, a Nazi. Today she’s a hero to the far left feminists and abortion advocates. They revere her. Do you think anyone who supports such a disgusting woman would object to butchering children? No. It’s all part of the plan for a cleaner race.
Margaret Sanger and her cultish followers are what evil looks like. If you wanted to know…
By Courtney Kirchoff and Anthony Mittelo
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.
When you go to snopes be sure and clear out all your history and cache you just let them have everything there is to know about you. When i was a teeenager we did not have access to birth control. I had been molested for years, unbeknownst to my parents. I did not want to let them know i was pregnant till after my first trimester. I did not know it at the time but i had a bit of knowing. My brother wanted money and told me if i didn’t go get money from my parents he would tell i was pregnant. Well, im was not one to play that kind of game, so i went in and told my parents. My mom asked what i wanted to do. I said well i guess with brother and his wife and baby here, the last thing you need is me. I guess ill abort it. My heart broke in a million pieces my when my bible thumping mom told me to find the money myself. Somehow my knowing, told me to wait till the 3 months was over was correct. After the abortion i almost did, i was throwing huge blood clots. After that my knowing, knew i would walk down the lowest roads society would offer. I developed an eating disorder and eventually was 600lbs. Every bite i ate was a wish for death. I know i am not the only one who suffers with the guilt of killing their child. Abortion should not be so readily available. i am 54 and almost died last year, still eating myself to death. Only this time source cut something deep out of me and i no long am eating to die.
sorry for the grammar and spelling guess it still is hard to get out and i did reread it before i posted
Michal, I am glad you brought this specific subject up for discussion. There is no fault on you or reason to feel guilt when you were a victim of sexual abuse or rape. There are two specific instances on which you have a choice because it’s merciful & spiritually “OK” to abort an unborn child. The first one is when the child have been proven to be grossly deformed or handicap to the point that it will suffer greatly for his/her entire biological life if born. The second instance is when sexual abuse or rape has occurred because, if the victim is not mentally strong enough, it could have lifetime extremely detrimental psychological effects on the victims mind such in your specific case, therefore Michal forgive yourself & lovingly move on with your life because you did nothing wrong!
An embryo is not a baby, therefore it cannot be “murdered.” And the Sanger quotes cannot be verified. http://www.snopes.com/margaret-sanger-weeds/. Just because it’s on the internet, doesn’t mean it’s true. I’m am deeply concerned about knee-jerk reactions and blind re-posting of anything without researching if the statements are true or not.
Dear Trueleigh, Life is Life whether a scientist separates the process between embryos, fetuses and babies, life start at inception and not later: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/04/26/bright-flash-of-light-marks-incredible-moment-life-begins-when-s/ There are many sources where you can research that fact. Snopes have been proven again and again by alternative media to be a NWO disinformation site. If you choose to do your research & get your “truths & facts” out of it I am afraid you better off looking into alternative media channels or just following your heart instead.
If only it were so simple. Reality is always more convoluted and filled with all shades of grey. We can all agree that killing a living embryo is not part of living in love and yet there are accidents and all kinds of natural occurrences where this happens. Again the answer is not simple and direct. As with so much of our reality there is always some truth within the lies.
Dying by natural causes or accidents is part of natural life death cycle, making the conscious and premeditated decision to terminate someones life because of “inconvenience” is unnatural and will have consequences on our spiritual paths.
I feel the article conveys useful information but does not sufficiently distinguish the moral issues arising from judiciously preventing the irresponsible generation of children on the one hand from, on the other, murdering children who are already there.
Life start at inception Kendrick, there is where the soul comes into the new formed embryo, unborn yet alive. The child should not be used as scapegoat & therefore punish by death because of the irresponsible sins of the parents.
Who’s to say that a generation of children is irresponsible, Kendrick? Or the birth of one child?
What if someone would’ve said that about your birth? To me, it’s exactly as Edward Morgan points
out in his response to your remark. Which, to me, is present on a slippery slope.