Thanks to Devon for sharing this:

What is wireless technology?

Wireless technology is any means of sending information or energy through space
without wires. It includes:

satellites, radar, radio, television, cell towers, cell phones, cordless phones,
microwave ovens

smart meters, WiFi, Bluetooth, fitness trackers, smart watches, baby monitors

wireless keyboards, mice, printers, headphones and speakers, wireless
security systems, wireless car keys, wireless garage door openers, wireless
battery chargers, remote controls, wireless microphones

RFID chips in credit cards and driver’s licenses, radio collars and chips in
wildlife, cattle and pets, chips in home appliances

wireless hearing aids, assistive listening devices, medical alert pendants, chips
in medical implants, wireless pacemakers

autonomous vehicles, drones, and robots

numerous other radioenabled devices that are proliferating in today’s world

Every one of these devices, without exception, emits radiation.

What’s wrong with wireless technology?

By substituting radiation for wires, we are swimming in an ocean of artificial
electromagnetic fields that are interfering with life itself. We are in effect
electrocuting ourselves, our children, our pets, the insects, birds, animals, trees and
plants around us and all of living creation. We are killing our planet.

This is about longterm exposure, right? Cancer that takes years to

No. The effects are rapid. Heart rate changes immediately. Blood sugar rises in
minutes. Having wireless devices on in your house interferes with your sleep and
your memory. Using a cell phone destroys brain cells in minutes to hours, and can
cause a stroke or a heart attack. Studies show that even cancer can develop within
months of first exposure. When a cell tower is turned on, birds leave the area
immediately. Insects disappear. Even slugs and snails vanish. Most of this takes no
time at all.

What types of radiation are used in wireless technology?

All frequencies of radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, lasers,
sound waves, even nuclear radiation. Most home devices use microwaves.

Isn’t microwave radiation natural? Don’t microwaves come from the
sun and stars?

Almost all the radiation we receive from the universe is the light and heat from the
sun, not microwave radiation. The microwave radiation a person receives from an
average cell tower is millions of times stronger than all the microwave radiation from
the sun and stars. The microwave radiation a person’s brain receives from their cell
phone is billions of times stronger than the microwave radiation from the sun and
stars. And at any particular frequency it is trillions of times stronger than the
microwave radiation he or she receives from the sun and stars at that frequency.
And the faint microwaves from the sun and stars are not pulsed and modulated. It is
the pulsations and modulation that cause much of the harm.

Aren’t light and microwaves both electromagnetic? Therefore isn’t
microwave radiation safe?

No. That is like saying arsenic is safe because oxygen and arsenic are both elements,
or that cyanide is safe because water and cyanide are both chemicals. But oxygen
and water are necessary for life, while arsenic and cyanide are deadly poisons. It is
the same with electromagnetic radiation. Visible light is necessary for life.
Microwave radiation is a deadly poison.

Aren’t toxic chemicals more harmful than electromagnetic radiation?

Electromagnetism is more complex and more fundamental than chemistry.
Electromagnetism shapes the sun and stars. Electromagnetism animates life.
Electromagnetism is behind chemistry. There is no “chemical force” in the universe.
Outside of atomic nuclei, there is only gravity and electromagnetism.
Electromagnetism guides everything we see, including ourselves. Chemistry is an
effect, not a cause.

Can’t we find safe frequencies? Won’t that solve the problem?

That is looking at both wireless technology and life too simplistically.

Most wireless technology has only one goal: to transmit information to computers,
information of great complexity and variety. It is not simple, constant radiation of
one amplitude and one frequency: such radiation would carry no information.
Instead, it is multiple large frequency bands, each divided into hundreds, thousands,
and millions of individual frequencies of all different bandwidths, overlapping and
interacting, pulsed at an enormous variety of intervals, in an enormous variety of
shapes, patterns and durations, all over the world. Even a single signal from a single
device has a variety of amplitudes, frequencies and pulsations, and is modulated in
complex ways in order to carry all the information needed to be read by a cell phone
or computer.

Life has to also carry an enormous, almost infinite complexity of information in its
nervous systems and its meridians, and to store and process this information in its
cells, organs and chakras, and in its DNA which is shared and circulated among
trillions of individuals of 50 million different species, all connected to one another
and to the earth, sky and universe in a grand circuit of energy and information.

The artificial cloud of energy and information is interfering with, overpowering and
destroying the natural, living circuitry of energy and information. It cannot be

What about LiFi? If light is safe, why not use light instead of

Light is a nutrient. We absorb it with our eyes, and into our blood. It is necessary for
health. It regulates our biorhythms. Green plants need it for photosynthesis. We
absorb more of the pulsations and modulation frequencies when they are carried
into our bodies by light than when they are carried into our bodies by microwaves.
LiFi is more harmful to life than WiFi.

Cell phones are much smaller than cell towers. Doesn’t that mean
they are safer? Doesn’t it mean the radiation does not travel as far?

Cell phones and cell towers emit the same radiation; size has nothing to do with it.
The main difference is that a cell tower emits as many signals simultaneously as
there are cell phones communicating with it at that time, whereas a cell phone only
emits one voice channel and one data channel. A cell tower therefore emits stronger
radiation than a cell phone, but by the time it reaches your body, its radiation is
much weaker than the radiation from a cell phone that you hold in your hand, near
your body. And a cell phone emits signals that a cell tower does not: Bluetooth, WiFi,
GPS and other signals.

The radiation from a cell phone travels just as far as the radiation from a cell tower.
The radiation from a cell phone will reach all people, animals, birds, insects and
plants in line of sight with it, no matter how far away. It will reach a cell tower 90
miles away. It will reach a satellite 22,300 miles away. It will reach Mars 200 million
miles away. With 15 billion mobile devices on the Earth, we are polluting not just our
homes, our neighborhoods and our planet, but the entire solar system.

My cell phone does not make me sick. Why should I stop using it?

Your cell phone is damaging your health whether you are aware of it or not. It is
damaging your bloodbrain barrier the barrier that keeps bacteria, viruses and
toxic chemicals out of your brain tissue; the barrier that maintains the inside of your
head at a constant pressure, preventing you from having a stroke. Since brain tissue

has no pain receptors, plenty of damage can occur without pain. Instead, it will cause
memory loss, difficulty concentrating, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders and so
forth. In rats, damage to the bloodbrain barrier can be detected after just a two
minute exposure to a cell phone. After a twohour exposure the damage is
permanent. There is no reason for it to be different in humans.

The radiation from your cell phone is also slowing your metabolism your ability to
digest sugars, fats and proteins. This causes either obesity or weight loss, depending
on your genetic makeup. It also causes diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Wireless
technology is the cause of more obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer than any
other factor.

The people who are aware of the damage in real time are the people who can feel it
in their nervous system or their heart. That is maybe onethird of the population. It
feels to them like they are being electrocuted. And they are, but so is everyone else.
The few who have heard of such a thing call themselves “electrosensitive.” Those
who have not heard of it think they are suffering from anxiety, or that they have a
neurological or cardiac disorder.

Isn’t a flip phone safer than a smartphone?

Both are digital and both emit pulsed, modulated microwave radiation. And despite
what many people think, flip phones can emit as much radiation, or more, than
smartphones. But safety is not determined by power level. Damage to the blood
brain barrier is greatest at the lowest power level, at least in laboratory rats. The
bandwidth is more important than power level. Smartphones use more bandwidth
than flip phones.

The bottom line is that cell phones have been killing people since they were
invented. In each city in the United States where 2G “flip phone” service was turned
on for the first time in 1996 or 1997, mortality rose immediately, on the day it was
turned on in each city. And the overall health of the population was damaged
permanently. At least ten thousand Americans died from the radiation within three
months after 2G “flip phone” service was turned on in various cities in 1996 and
1997. Whether more people died from their new phones or from the new cell towers
is impossible to know: the radiation comes from both.

Isn’t a cell phone safe to use as long as you hold it away from your

About 20 years ago someone started promoting the idea of the “near field plume”
which was supposed to extend out six inches from a cell phone, and that if you held
your phone more than six inches from your head, you were safe. That is a complete
fiction. There is no such thing as a near field “plume.” It does not exist.

The region very near to a source of radiation, where the electric field and the
magnetic field are separate and complex, is called the near field. The space very far
from the source, where the electric and magnetic fields are tied together and
diminish with distance, is called the far field. The near and far fields blend into one
another. There is no dividing line where one stops and the other begins. And it is
certainly not true that the radiation stops at six inches. If that were true, the
radiation would never reach a cell tower and the phone would not work. And if it
were true of a cell phone, it would also be true of a cell tower, which emits the same
radiation. Then a cell tower would be safe if you stood more than six inches away
from one. How absurd!

And your body is a conductor, so if you are holding the phone in your hand, no
matter how far away from your head, the microwaves are conducted into your hand
and throughout your body, and your arm is an extension of the phone and is part of
the radiating antenna.

If you put the phone on a table in front of you and do not hold it, then the
microwaves are just irradiating you and not being conducted into you. But since for
some types of harm, for example damage to the bloodbrain barrier, the damage
increases with distance, that does not protect you either.

If the radiation levels from cell phones and cell towers were reduced,
wouldn’t that make them safe?

No. It is the informational content, not power level, that causes the harm. A cell

phone exposes the brain to microwave radiation at roughly 10 milliwatts per square
centimeter. At power levels one trillion times lower than that, microwave radiation
has been shown to affect ovulation, the immune system, plant growth, human brain
waves, and the structure of DNA.

Don’t we need more studies before we know if microwaves are

No. We already had 10,000 studies by 1980. Today we have at least 30,000 studies.
There are more studies showing harm from microwaves and radio frequency
radiation than from any other pollutants except tobacco smoke and mercury.

How long has this been going on? How long have we known that
wireless technology is harmful?

For as long as wireless technology has been around. At Marconi’s first public
demonstration of radio in Salisbury Plain in 1896, spectators described various nerve
sensations they experienced. When Marconi turned on the first French radio station
in Wimereux, one man who lived nearby “burst in with a revolver” because the
waves were causing him sharp internal pains. On the evening of January 22, 1901,
when Marconi fired up a new, more powerful transmitter on the Isle of Wight,
Queen Victoria, in residence on the island, had a stroke and died. Within a few years,
90 percent of the bees on the island had disappeared. Marconi himself suffered from
recurring fevers from the time he began experimenting with radio and for the rest of
his life. He suffered nine heart attacks, the last one killing him at age 63. Even prior
to Marconi, in the early 1890s, JacquesArsène d’Arsonval published the results of
experiments on humans and animals showing that high frequencies affect blood
pressure and profoundly alter metabolism.

Do telecommunications company officials know their products are
harmful? Are they doing this to us deliberately?

They all use cell phones like the rest of the world and are as much in denial about
them as everyone else. The denial, which runs deep in society, goes back to the
beginning of the development of electricity in the 1700s.

I keep my phone off except in emergencies. Doesn’t that protect me
and others?

A cell phone leaks radiation from all of its resonant circuitry, even if it is turned off,
as long as the battery is in it. So does a modem or router that has WiFi, as long as it is
plugged in. I have measured radiation coming out of modems in which the WiFi was

disabled. I can always tell when someone is carrying a cell phone because I can feel
the radiation, even if it is turned off and hidden in their pocket, even from across a
room. I have never been wrong.

For whatever reason you have a cell phone any kind of cell phone all of the
world’s cell towers have to be there in order for it to work when you want it to. No
matter how rarely you use the phone, all the cell towers have to be there. If you use
it “only in emergencies,” that is even worse, because you are likely to be using it in
remote places where there are no cell towers and service is not good. Every call you
make from a location where there are no towers is recorded as a request for service,
and your provider will eventually put up a cell tower there in response to those calls.

When I am at home I use my cell phone connected by an ethernet
cord to a modem. Doesn’t that protect me?

It does not protect you because it is still emitting radiation. It does not protect others
because when you are not at home you need all the cell towers to be there and you
are irradiating everyone around you simply by carrying the phone around.

There are no landlines available where I live. I need my cell phone.

Unless people get rid of their cell phones, there will soon be no landlines left
anywhere. The existence of landlines depends on demand. The existence of cell
phones depends on demand. No one is doing this to us. We are doing it to ourselves.

Is fiber the solution?

Fiber enables 5G. 5G antennas are connected to each other and to the Internet by
fiber optic cables. Wireless companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars
laying fiber all over the world for 5G. When a fiber company or a city lays fiber optic
cables, wireless companies pay for the right to use it. After the fiber is laid, they stick
antennas into it and broadcast 5G.

How is 5G different from 4G?

5G can use much higher frequencies (millimeter waves). But the biggest difference is
that 5G towers and 5G mobile devices aim narrowly focused beams at each other
instead of sending the radiation in all directions. If you are holding a 5G phone in

your hand, the nearest 5G tower is tracking you and aiming a beam of radiation
directly at your body. This is called phased array technology and it results in greater
penetration of the radiation into your body, even at millimeter wave frequencies,
than previous wireless technologies. 5G towers also send radiation in all directions
because they are constantly scanning the environment looking for devices to connect

Is 5G a weapon?

No. 5G can use millimeter waves. There are also crowdcontrol weapons that use
millimeter waves. But the weapons are a thousand times more powerful and they
are not modulated and carry no information. They are different technologies that
were developed by different people for different purposes.

Are there devices that can protect us from these frequencies?

There are many companies today that prey on the gullibility of people who are
desperate to protect themselves from an assault that is coming from everywhere.
They sell “protective” chips to put on your cell phone or computer, pendants and
bracelets that will “neutralize” or “harmonize” the radiation, devices to plug into
your wall that will “protect” an area hundreds or thousands of square feet around
your house. Some advertise that they are “quantum” devices, or are based on
“scalar” technology or “torsion” fields, which are sexy words that sound scientific but
mean nothing. You cannot “neutralize” or “harmonize” radiation. These devices,
without exception, are ineffective and most will harm you.

Many of these devices emit a 7.83 Hz signal which is supposed to duplicate the first
Schumann resonance of the Earth. These are point sources that cannot duplicate a
natural frequency that bathes us from all sides. They make some people feel good
for a couple of weeks, and they can be addictive, just like the frequencies from a cell
phone or computer can be addictive, but they will harm you.

What are the alternatives?

The alternative is wires. Wired phones. Wired computers. There is no need to
reinvent the wheel, wires are what we had before wireless and are superior in every
way. Wires carry the same voices, but clearer. The same information, but more
securely. And the information is contained in the wires, instead of being broadcast all

over the earth in a cloud of radiation. Wireless is convenient, but for the sake of
convenience we are killing ourselves in real time and destroying our planet.

Recommended reading:
The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life

Chapter 8, “Mystery on the Isle of Wight”

Chapter 9, “Earth’s Electric Envelope”

Chapter 11, “Irritable Heart”

Chapter 12, “The Transformation of Diabetes”

Chapter 13, “Cancer and the Starvation of Life”

Chapter 16, “Bees, Birds, Trees, and Humans”

Arthur Firstenberg

The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
ECHOEarth (End Cellphones Here On Earth)
P.O. Box 6216

Santa Fe, NM 87502


phone: +1 5054710129

[email protected]

February 16, 2022

The last 36 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading and
sharing on the
Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the
newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, French,
Norwegian, and Dutch.

To subscribe, go to or click on this link:

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.


  1. Thank you, Derek, for posting this article, about a subject that has moved to the background a bit.
    The invisible presence of EMF is in our homes, our streets, and our workplace. Like when electricity arrived in human society, affecting the human nervous system and the experience of light changed dramatically, digital technology does affect our nervous system also.
    I believe, when there's a mixture of a quantity of exposure to wireless devices, where signals are sent and received by cell towers, and after an unknown period of time, the effect may show up, possibly in inscrutable ways, stealth-wise.
    Combined with the effect of an mRNA vaccine that is present in human bodies, symptoms of auto-immune diseases may increase in the coming years when these effects are ignored.
    In the last few years, I'm sensitive to the glaring light in shops or other people's homes, even the cars have headlights that are almost painful and even cause a slight nausea. TL-light flickers often, and from the corner of my eye I can see the flicker of a LED-lamp, at least, once this happened in my home when I had changed a lightbulb.

    To see the dawn grow brighter, to notice the light changing through the day, its timbre, and its ending with twilight is something I try to witness without too much light in my living room. Sometimes, especially now in the winter season, I'm waiting with switching on lamps until it's almost dark. That's now around 18.30 pm, and I usually enjoy such a time for contemplation.

    I like the natural change of sun-day-light and would love to live without electric lights. Just oil lamps, candles, and a lovely campfire or a fire in a woodstove. Well, this was my contemplation 😉
    Here's a summary of Arthur Firstenberg's book "The Invisible Rainbow" with a PDF download in it:

    • I moved into a home with all LED light bulbs
      I removed them all
      I cant drive at night anymore because of the LED headlights
      Even with protective eye wear
      I cant travel or be in strong wifi hotspots because I get ill feeling
      Weird feelings hard to explain,and nausea.
      I now live 5 hours from any major city, we have very poor 4G but Im fine with that.
      I have fiber optics in my home because I am so rural
      I wont be able to return to even a suburb until this is put to an end.
      Some people arent affected by it
      Im grounding myself all the time but i have always been sensitive so to speak
      I am an Empath and it can be difficult because i am feeling everyone's anxiety and its not mine necessarily
      I have to keep telling myself that and I tell it to go away because that energy doesnt belong to me 😉

      • Yes, I understand, these new headlights of cars are awful to meet in the streets, azuryte crystal. It's why I'm at home in the evenings most of the time. Also, I avoid public transport, since the lockdowns started.
        The energy of groups of people is so tense, I find, and having to wear a facemask is suffocating when the journey takes an hour or so.
        I'm happy for you to have found a living space 5 hours away from a city. In these last 2 years, after returning from rural Britain to my Dutch home in a city, the longing for rural living has kept my resolution alive.
        Looking forward to the moment of free border crossing, spending my time in Britain for 6 months each year, near the ocean in the South of that beautiful island.
        Unvaccinated 😉
        Yesterday I called a friend in rural Britain, and she told me that people in her village, didn't follow the protocols that much, like with gatherings in the clubhouse, and in the shop or in church.
        See what I mean? The further away from "Big Brother watching you" the easier life is


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here