How to Create Your Very Own Fake Pandemic

By Makia Freeman,

So you want to create a fake pandemic, huh?

You’ve come to the right place! Today we offer all budding control freaks, fearmongers, warmongers, Machiavellian social engineers, psychopaths and Satanists a wonderful and elaborate step-by-step guide for how you can create your very own fake pandemic. Before we begin, please ensure you own some portion of the mass media/MSM – you’ll need it to relentlessly broadcast the narrative I’m about to reveal. Other prerequisites include owning stocks in vaccine companies and having access to ‘soul-for-sale’ scientists whose brains you can buy to publish whatever results you want (Gates Foundation gives $79 million to Imperial College in England). You know – the kind of scientists and shills who will reliably ‘find’ the right result that bolsters your propaganda. Got those in place already? Then you’re all set! Let’s begin.

1. Choose a Time for Your Fake Pandemic When There Are Already Many Diseases

The first guideline here is that you can’t literally make up a pandemic out of nothing. There has to be something going on in the background that causing some deaths. For this reason, I recommend choosing winter time, when the seasonal flu is going around and people are already getting sick.

coronavirus common cold2. Make up a New Disease with an Unknown or Scary-Sounding Name

The average person had never heard of a coronavirus before, and would have had no clue that ‘coronavirus’ is defined in medical encyclopedias as the common cold. The average person would also never know that, according to doctors like Wolfgang Wodarg, coronaviruses make up approximate 7-15% of all viruses found in cases of acute respiratory disease, and therefore many people already have trillions of them in their body at any time, given the human virome is 380 trillion.

Choosing something new that people know little to nothing about with a scary or cool-sounding name is best, so they can’t contradict you when you tell them how infectious, contagious and deadly it is

3. DIY Bioweapons

This next step is not essential, but if you have climbed up the psychopath ladder far enough, it will surely appeal to you and come in very handy. Use your resources to fund scientists and bioweapons labs around the world. Get them to make new pathogenic strains – do-it-yourself bioweapons – then arrange for it to be ‘accidentally’ released in a country you despise. That way, you can score geopolitical points by harming that nation and you can increase the likelihood of your own fake pandemic taking off. However this is only a side idea not an essential element, because Problem-Reaction-Solution works just as well as Perceived Problem-Reaction-Solution as long as you control people’s perception, which you will via the MSM. If people ask where the virus originated, play it off as a big coincidence. Just say it came from some animal and then crossed species, or use some other unlikely story, just so long as no one could possibly blame you for engineering and releasing the virus from your bioweapons labs.

4. Frame the Context of How Bad This is Against Background Deaths

Right from the start, you need to use the MSM to frame the context. Control the narrative by telling people this is way worse than anything that’s ever happened before. Hype, hype, hype. Most people are intellectually lazy. Even with the internet at their fingertips, they won’t check the figures or do the thinking required to put your fake pandemic into proper context. They want the MSM to spoon feed them and tell them how to think about this new thing. So have your MSM reporters, news readers and anchors use dramatic faces and tones to impart fear. If necessary, this may even involve going back in time to manipulate past figures to aid your current propaganda, i.e. changing history as Orwell laid out in 1984.

5. Bring in Fake ‘Experts’ with Exaggerated Simulation Models Predicting Doom

The next phase requires that you bring in ‘science’ on your side, to bolster your ‘evidence-based’ and ‘data-driven’ image. It’s all about perception control. Introduce new buzzwords and buzzphrases like flatten the curvesocial distancing and the new normal and ensure all your paid lackeys repeat them ad nauseam. Keep repeating how your approach is evidence-based despite the fact that phrase is meaningless when the numbers are so easy to manipulate. Bring in a legion of fake experts on your payroll who are paid science shills to say whatever you want. Choose the ones with the most dire and end-of-times computer simulation models, and loudly proclaim this new virus is extraordinary and unprecedented. Predict lots of deaths (recall during the 2005 H5N1 bird flu, the Senior UN System Coordinator predicted it could kill 5 to 150 million people, yet it only killed around 100). By the time the whole thing is over, and the actual number of deaths only turns out to be way under 1% of your predicted number, no one will remember, and if they do, just use Big Tech to censor the truth tellers and the MSM to distract the masses with diversions so no one will pay attention.

6. Manipulate the CFR (Case Fatality Rate)

Some people will begin to ask about the CFR, so here’s what to do. You can manipulate it in 2 main ways: increase the numerator (attribute other deaths to this new disease, even if this disease was present in their bodies at death but didn’t cause it) and decrease the denominator. To increase the numerator, relax the laws everywhere to allow doctors to ascribe the cause of death to the new virus, even if it had nothing to do with the actual death. Heart attack? He died from the virus. Lung collapse? She died from the virus. Hit by a truck? Another virus death. To decrease the denominator, calculate it from the number of confirmed infected cases rather than the estimated infected (that way the number is sure to be lower). Using only confirmed cases will give you a much higher CFR or death rate, around 10 to 100 times higher. Then, compare apples with oranges discussing the seasonal flu CFR (around 0.1%, based on estimated infected) juxtaposed with the new killer virus CFR (try to get it as high as 10%, based on confirmed infected). Magic! Naturally, there is no need to ever share the fact that the death rate for the ordinary seasonal flu from confirmed cases is around 10%. Make sure people never hear of this number.

[Make sure people also never hear that Iceland’s tests show that of COVID-19 positives, ~50% of people have mild symptoms and ~50% have zero symptoms, that LA County has 40x more people with COVID-19 than previously known, and that Santa Clara County has 50-85x more people with COVID-19 than previously known).

7. Balance Increasing CFR with Increasing Cases to Show Fast and Dangerous Spread

You have a delicate juggling act to perform. You have to get the CFR as high as possible to scare the living daylights out of people, getting them to believe this new killer virus is catastrophic, with a never-before-seen kill rate. However, if you make the denominator too low, people will see there’s not many cases. That won’t work, because you also need to create the impression this thing is spreading quickly and uncontrollably.

So, here’s what you do. You increase the rate of testing as time goes on to create the perception of fast spread. Remember, the media will use your testing figures, so start testing slowly, then gradually increase it as the fake pandemic begins to take hold of people’s minds. Consequently, the rate of confirmed cases will match the rate of testing; the more tests, the more confirmed cases. This will make it look like the virus is spreading faster than it actually is. For example, at the beginning you could test 100 people and find 10 new cases; then the next day you could test 200 people and find 20 new cases; then you could test 800 people and discover 80 new cases. The virus is not necessarily spreading; you are just testing more people. However, people will believe the virus is spreading. You can also test in a selective way. If you want to get more cases, then just test people you are confident already have the disease. Control which stories, which nursing homes, which districts, which cities, which states and which countries to focus upon with the MSM to mold perception.

8. Make the Symptoms Vague, Broad and Ill-Defined

Cough? Mucus? Fatigue? Trouble breathing? Fever? These kind of symptoms could mean any one of countless diseases. Keep the symptoms of the new virus unrealistically broad, so people think they have contracted it when they innocently get tired, cough or get a cold. A really great fake pandemic takes anything and incorporates into the narrative. You must siphon up all the deaths that are happening anywhere in the world and use them for your cause. A fake pandemic doesn’t require just 1 disease or just 1 cause. Horrible air pollution? 5G radiation? Poor hygiene and sanitation? Chemtrail aerosols causing poisoning? Heavy metal contamination? Industrial pollution? Microplastics causing disease in people’s bodies? GMOs leading to organ damage? Blame anything and everything upon the new killer virus. Plus, this will let your corporate and military friends off the hook for their pollution and secret operations which are destroying the planet.

9. Say the Pathogen Spreads Easily Via Air, Food, Body Fluids and Surfaces

Fear is the currency of control. People will be more afraid if you say this new virus can spread from anything – air, food and body fluids. Tell people it can survive on surfaces for days, weeks even. See what you can get away with. Stretch the bounds of incredulity. People don’t think clearly, rationally or intelligently when they are in fear. Make people anxious about basic natural and social activities. Make people completely OCD about everything in their lives, including touching cash.

10. Hype Serious Cases and Young People Dying

Make sure people don’t wake up to the fact that this new pandemic is only affecting the elderly or immuno-compromised people. You need to hype any deaths of young and healthy people. You have the whole world to choose from. Magnify all the serious cases. Focus on any peaks in the statistics. If things calm down in certain regions, ignore them.

11. Show Pics of Mass Graves and Forklifts Loading Dead Bodies for Effect

Add a touch of Hollywood special effects to your fake pandemic. Show alleged mass graves and forklifts loading alleged dead bodies into trucks to amplify the fear in minds of the population.

12. Use Your Big Tech Friends to Censor Anything that Counters your Narrative

Unfortunately, there will be some sane and level-headed people that will see through the fake pandemic propaganda. Some of them may even be scientists or doctors who will want to publish papers doubting the official narrative. Use your friends at Big Tech (Google, Facebook, Twitter and even smaller players like Vimeo) to censor anything that runs counter to your information. They have carefully-crafted policies already in place to protect their users from uncomfortable opinions. Dominate the narrative by flooding it with editors and websites on your payroll, or celebrities and public opinion molders who are too stupid to realize what is happening. Conduct some fake polls to show the majority of the population supports the draconian measures taken. Cause economic distress to independent journalists so they are laid off, so you can gain even more narrative control.

13. Spin the Fact it Wasn’t That Bad by Claiming Your Measures Saved the Day

When the fake pandemic eventually winds down – as it must – you must claim credit for it. You must deflect attention away from the fact it wasn’t really that bad, and didn’t actually kill that many people, by claiming it was only your great leadership, intervention, regulations, economic shutdown, lockdowns, quarantines and house arrests that saved the day. Otherwise, it could have been a lot worse. Of course, that is an empty hypothetical claim that could never be disproven, so you’ll be able to get away with it unchallenged.

Now You’re Ready to Go Out and Create Your Very Own Fake Pandemic

So there you have it. We have covered the steps you need to know to manufacture your own fake pandemic. If you pull it off, you’ll have become a master manipulator and will graduate with honors to our inner cult, so expect an invitation from us in the future to worship under a 40 foot owl. And remember, it’s all about perception control: taking what exists already and creating the crisis in people’s heads. As a bonus, with the utter mess and chaos you’ll create, a real crisis or two is bound to appear somewhere, so then you can use that as well to further your power and agendas even more. What’s not to like?

Hat tip to Mandatory Intellectomy.


Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at Makia is on Steemit and FB.














Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

4 thoughts on “How to Create Your Very Own Fake Pandemic”

  1. This is how we’re attacked by a manipulated virus that serves a twofold agenda. Minimizing the world population and an economic collapse by locking us all up:

    This is what I found at in the Quanon Drops and Potus Tweets:
    “Controversial experiments that could make bird flu riskier, poised to resume

    By Jocelyn Kaiser Feb. 8, 2019, 8:45 PM (Source: link is at the end of this comment)

    “Controversial lab studies that modify bird flu viruses in ways that could make them riskier to humans will soon resume after being on hold for more than 4 years. ScienceInsider has learned that last year, a U.S. government review panel quietly approved experiments proposed by two labs that were previously considered so dangerous that federal officials had imposed an unusual top-down moratorium on such research.

    One of the projects has already received funding from the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in Bethesda, Maryland, and will start in a few weeks; the other is awaiting funding.

    The outcome may not satisfy scientists who believe certain studies that aim to make pathogens more potent or more likely to spread in mammals are so risky they should be limited or even banned. Some are upset because the government’s review will not be made public. “After a deliberative process that cost $1 million for [a consultant’s] external study and consumed countless weeks and months of time for many scientists, we are now being asked to trust a completely opaque process where the outcome is to permit the continuation of dangerous experiments,“ says Harvard University epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch.

    One of the investigators leading the studies, however, says he’s happy he can resume his experiments. “We are glad the United States government weighed the risks and benefits … and developed new oversight mechanisms. We know that it does carry risks. We also believe it is important to work to protect human health,” says Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin in Madison and the University of Tokyo. The other group that got the green light is led by Ron Fouchier at Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

    In 2011, Fouchier and Kawaoka alarmed the world by revealing they had separately modified the deadly avian H5N1 influenza virus so that it spread between ferrets. Advocates of such gain of function (GOF) studies say they can help public health experts better understand how viruses might spread and plan for pandemics. But by enabling the bird virus to more easily spread among mammals, the experiments also raised fears that the pathogen could jump to humans.

    And critics of the work worried that such a souped-up virus could spark a pandemic if it escaped from a lab or was intentionally released by a bioterrorist. After an extensive discussion about whether the two studies should even be published (they ultimately were) and a voluntary moratorium by the two labs, the experiments resumed in 2013 under new U.S. oversight rules.

    But concerns reignited after more papers and a series of accidents at federal biocontainment labs. In October 2014, U.S. officials announced an unprecedented “pause” on funding for 18 GOF studies involving influenza or the Middle East respiratory syndrome or severe acute respiratory syndrome viruses. (About half were later allowed to continue because the work didn’t fit the definition or was deemed essential to public health.)

    Kawaoka’s grant is the same one on H5N1 that was paused in 2014. It includes identifying mutations in H5N1 that allow it to be transmitted by respiratory droplets in ferrets. He shared a list of reporting requirements that appear to reflect the new HHS review criteria. For example, he must immediately notify NIAID if he identifies an H5N1 strain that is both able to spread via respiratory droplets in ferrets and is highly pathogenic, or if he develops an EPPP that is resistant to antiviral drugs. Under the HHS framework, his grant now specifies reporting timelines and who he must notify at the NIAID and his university.

    Fouchier’s proposed projects are part of a contract led by virologists at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City (most of Project 5, Aim 3.1, and Project 6 in this letter). They include identifying molecular changes that make flu viruses more virulent and mutations that emerge when H5N1 is passaged through ferrets. The HHS panel did not ask that any proposed experiments be removed or modified.

    Suggestions included clarifying how his team will monitor workers for possible exposures and justifying the strains they plan to work with, which include H7N9 viruses, Fouchier says.”

    Read the rest of the article here:


Leave a Comment