Before diving into Jordan’s research, I’d like share that there is a history of pandemics that appear to conicide with emerging technology, specifically, those that generate electromagnetic frequencies (EMF), radio waves, microwaves and radiation. Although there have been numerous outbreaks of plagues in history, it is my conjecture that those in 20th century appear to have started with the first introduction of overhead wires for sending telegrams, then radio waves (including TV) and later microwaves, nuclear energy and now, Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic Field Radiation.  Everytime a new form of EMF was introduced into society a percentage of the population’s health seems to be negatively impacted. We are forced to adopt or die with the new frequencies. New vaccinations did not always help, and as with Covid-19 vaccinations, seem to be harming and even killing many who voluntarily took them and the boosters. Because it’s been experimental (and up to the individual to agree to take it), there is no financial assistance from the vaccine manufacturerers. But could frequencies play a larger roll in our health or loss of it?

Are pandemics a result of emerging technologies?

Consider the First World War or the Great War. It was an international conflict that began on 28 July 1914 and ended on 11 November 1918. The 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) started at the end of the war and with the introduction of radio.

In 1928 the first television broadcasts began and so did an influenza epidemic. However this one was milder than the 1917 Spanish Flu. 

In late 1946, an outbreak of influenza occurred in Japan and Korea in American troops. … Most remarkable was the total failure of vaccine containing a 1943 H1N1 strain (effective in the 1943-1944 and 1944-1945 seasons). What else was occuring in that time? Atomic weapons testing and it’s use on Hiroshima and Nagasake. Also, microwave radar was now being tested by the military and considered one of the possible reasons for the UFO crashes in Roswell New Mexico.

The 1957-1958 Asian flu pandemic was a global pandemic of influenza A virus subtype H2N2 that originated in Guizhou in southern China. The number of excess deaths caused by the pandemic is estimated to be 1-4 million around the world (1957-1958 and probably beyond), making it one of the deadliest pandemics in history.  At the same time, Russia launched Sputnik and the US and other countries were still testing nuclear power.

The world’s first nuclear-powered submarine and entered service in 1954. Named for the fictional submarine in Jules Verne’s classic Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea as well as several previous US Navy vessels, Nautilus broke new ground in submarine design and propulsion. The Russian Navy when it first started using nuclear power lost many of the crew as the nuclear subs tended to run hot (leaking radiation).

Between July 16 of 1945 and Sept. 23 of 1992, 1,132 nuclear weapons were fired or tested. List of United States nuclear weapons tests

We also experienced the Chernobyl disaster, a nuclear accident that occurred on 26 April 1986 at the No. 4 reactor in the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, near the city of Pripyat in the north of the Ukrainian SSR in the Soviet Union. It is considered the worst nuclear disaster in history both in cost and casualties. It is one of only two nuclear energy accidents rated at seven—the maximum severity.

The Fukushima nuclear disaster was a 2011 nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Ōkuma, Fukushima, Japan.The proximate cause of the disaster was the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. It was the most severe nuclear accident since the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. It was classified as Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES). 

Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic Field Radiation standards has appeared approximately every tenth year since 1G systems were introduced in 1979 and the early to mid-1980s. Each generation is characterized by new frequency bands, higher data rates and non-backward-compatible transmission technology. The first commercial 3G networks were introduced in mid-2001. 4G was introduced in 2009 which happens to coincided with the last major pandemic (and economic crisis) before 2020. Is this all just coincidence?

On to Jordan’s article from here on….

Although 5G has been in development for decades, its official public implementation began October 31st, 2019, just before the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in China during December 2019. While 5G may not be responsible the COVID-19 outbreak, but could RF-EMF Radiation be a contributory factor to its lasting symptoms?

When the 5G rollout first began, both the symptoms and severity of COVID-19 was still largely unknown. Similar to the tobacco and e-cigarettes, 5G and other forms of RF-EMF radiation are both addicting, and carcinogenic over time. Over time, the act of smoking tobacco becomes woven into a user’s daily routine. Similarly, 5G EMF frequencies also have the ability to control user behavior and form reliance, causing long-term addiction, despite the known potential negative consequences. The World Health Organization classifies RF-EMF radiation as an “environmental factor potentially carcinogenic to humans,” as well as describing it as “electromagnetic pollution.”

To deem 5G as completely harmless is to overlook the limited existing data and science which has been documented. Many RF-EMF users disavow awareness of the damages as a result of RF-EMF Radiation in order to maintain a false sense of security. Today, the majority of humanity has become dependent on their telecommunication devices, functioning as extension of our body. Some users interact with their cellular devices morning, noon, and night. This addictive habit produces consistent exposure to small amounts of RF-EMF Radiation.

Coincidentally, the 5G switch turned on when the outbreak of the pandemic began. Since then, there has been consistent COVID-19 symptoms, lasting health effects, and increased death. Everyone around the world, from politicians, to athletes have, seen major physiological changes in the overall health of the human race. Statistically, more deaths began to occur, contributing each death to COVID-19. In the past few years, the development of 5G technology has become an increasingly controversial topic. 5G allows a stronger signal to be projected allowing faster internet, better surveillance, more devices and users, and a clearer connection. Yet despite the many positives to 5G technology, there is an ominous force of knowledge, data, and information against the cutting-edge technology which has accumulated and materialized in the modern age. Could there be some truth to the “conspiracy theories” being swiftly discredited by mainstream media? Or, should the world procrastinate the discussion of 5G’s potential hazards and methods of protection until more statistics emerge?

Could 5G radiation be a contributory factor to COVID-19? Although the development of 5G technology allows mass surveillance and other global financial endeavors, 5G’s emerging side effects could be conducive to the symptoms being touted as “COVID-19”. This distraction enables 5G providers to continue to produce RF-EMF Radiation, similar to big tobacco’s cigarette campaigns, As the elite profit off of 5G’s technological possibilities, the people of the world—the working class—will ultimately suffer and succumb to its harmful effects. With major pharmaceutical companies financially profiting off of every member of the population, could 5G technologies be a contributory factor to the coronavirus’s lasting side effects?

3GPP – the global association responsible for developing the world’s 5G startdards, announced1 a three-month delay in their timeline for the releases of their upcoming 5G specifications (Releases 16 and 17) due to the severity in death and destruction reported by the media at the outbreak of COVID-19.

“My Administration is committed to rapid 5G deployment,” announced2 President Joe Biden on January 4th, 2022.

Can 5G Produce Ionizing Radiation?

As stated3 by the National Institutes of Health “Radiofrequency radiation (RF) is increasingly being recognized as a new form of environmental pollution.” To understand the dangers of 5G, one must first understand the existing hazards of RF-EMF Radiation. These officially recognized conditions are documented by a variety of institutions, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), and the American Cancer Society.

Related: RF-EMF Radiation

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) official website displays studies depicting the correlation between symptoms of coronavirus and 5G radiation4. While COVID-19 is documented to produce oxidative damage, oxidative damage also comes from exposure to ionizing radiation. Could the oxidative damage as a result of RF-EMF 5G Radiation be mis-diagnosed as a result of COVID-19?

On August 1, 1996, the FCC adopted the NCRP’s recommended Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and power density for the transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz.

Shorter wavelengths mean higher frequencies. Higher frequencies produce ionizing radiation and other significant health effects.

“5G is a protocol that will use high frequency bands and extensive bandwidths of the electromagnetic spectrum in the vast radiofrequency range from 600 MHz to nearly 100 GHz”

“Approximately 100,000 emitting satellites are planned to be launched into orbit. This infrastructure will significantly alter the world’s electromagnetic environment to unprecedented levels and may cause unknown consequences to the entire biosphere, including humans. The new infrastructure will service the new 5G devices, including 5G mobile phones, routers, computers, tablets, self-driving vehicles, machine-to-machine communications, and the Internet of Things.”

“During the first pandemic wave in the United States, COVID-19 attributed cases and deaths were statistically higher in states and major cities with 5G infrastructure as compared with states and cities that did not yet have this technology” stated Beverly Rubik of the Department of Mind-Body Medicine, College of Integrative Medicine and Health Sciences, in Pasadena CA, and Robert R. Brown Department of Radiology, Hamot Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Erie, PA; Radiology Partners, Phoenix, AZ

The Effects of 5G Wireless Communication Radiation (5G WCR)

5G produces Wireless Communication Radiation (WCR), yet the governments, and businesses of the world are silent to its effects, touting it as the next technology to improve download speeds, and allow artificial intelligence, among newer technologies.

In reality the health effects of Wireless Communication Radiation are also the same equal health risks of 5G. These health effects include:

• increased cancer risk
• endocrine changes
• increased free radical production
• deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage
• changes to the reproductive system
• learning and memory defects
• neurological disorders

Yet the world continues to move forward, placing these technologies at the forefront of civilization. As society becomes reliant on this scientifically acknowledged hazard to humanity, what long term effects will our species incur as a result?

The Effects of COVID-19

Beverly Rubik, Department of Mind-Body Medicine, and the Institute for Frontier Science in California and Robert R. Brown of the Department of Radiology, Hamot Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pennsylvania stated

“COVID-19 can cause insufficient oxygen levels (hypoxia) that have been seen in up to 80% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients exhibiting respiratory distress” –

“Decreased oxygenation and elevated carbon dioxide levels in patients’ blood have been observed, although the etiology [origin] for these findings remains unclear.”

“Massive oxidative damage to the lungs has been observed in areas of airspace opacification documented on chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. This cellular stress may indicate a biochemical rather than a viral etiology.”

“Because disseminated virus can attach itself to cells containing an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor; it can spread and damage organs and soft tissues throughout the body, including the lungs, heart, intestines, kidneys, blood vessels, fat, testes, and ovaries, among others. The disease can increase systemic inflammation and induce a hypercoagulable state. Without anticoagulation, intravascular blood clots can be devastating.”

While many have overcome the complications associated with COVID-19, some individuals have persistent symptoms, in addition to lasting effects, that has led to new diagnoses.

The WHO’s “Long COVID”

The term “Long COVID”—lasting symptoms after Covid-19 recovery—is an officially recognized condition5 by the World Health Organization (WHO), and a growing health concern. Could this novel diagnosis be a result of consistent exposure to 5G Wireless Communication Radiation?

Symptoms of Long COVID mimic that of radiation exposure, including

• headache, chest pain, muscle pain, pins and needles, forgetfulness, depression, decline in memory or cognitive function, brain fog, loss of smell, anxiety, persistent cough, shortness of breath, palpitations, diarrhea, abdominal pain, rash, recurrent fever, inflammation of the heart muscle, lung function abnormalities, sleep disturbances, muscle and joint pain, changes in mood or personality.

The symptoms, effects, and treatments of Long COVID-19 are still very under documented. The World Health Organization reported 30% of COVID-19 patients surveyed still had persistent symptoms after nine months.

The W.H.O.’s website states “The burden of post COVID-19 health issues is not very well documented. Yet, preliminary results from a nationally representative sample survey by the UK Office for National Statistics estimate that around 1 in 10 respondents who tested positive for COVID-19 may exhibit symptoms for a period of 12 weeks or longer.”

Beyond the World Health Organization’s admitted lack of data behind the lasting effects COVID-19, there are other factors which overlook the consideration of alternate causes, such as Wireless Communications Radiation, for being responsible for the on-going COVID-like symptoms. Although these patients diagnosed with Long COVID took into account their coronavirus history, many [if not all] medical diagnoses did not take into account any form of 5G Wireless Communications Radiation. Yet, 5G continues to play a major role in the future of telecommunications, and digital society.

Comparing the Bioeffects of COVID-19 and Wireless Communication Radiation (WCR)

The Bioeffects of both COVID-19 and Wireless Communication Radiation (WCR) produce startling correlations not only in symptoms, but biological effects and visible changes to the human body6. These changes act both in the short-term, and the long-term, contributing to changes in blood, oxidative stress, immune system disruption, increased intracellular calcium, and cardiac effects. Could the bioeffects of Wireless Communication Radiation (WCR) be often misinterpreted and misdiagnosed as COVID-19?

Blood Changes. Both WCR and COVID-19 cause notable blood changes. These include short-term effects rouleaux7 (the stacking of red cells), echinocytes. The long term changes to the blood include reduced blood clotting time, reduced hemoglobin (protein that carries oxygen), and hemodynamic disorders.

Oxidative Stress. Both WCR and COVID-19 cause oxidative stress. These include glutathione level decrease8, free radicals and lipid peroxide increase, as well as oxidative injury, organ damage, and injury to tissues and organs.

Immune System Disruption. Both WCR and COVID-19 cause immune system disruption. These include immune suppression, immune hyperactivation, the decreased production and suppression of T-lymphocytes (T-Cells), autoimmunity, organ injury, and organ failure.

Increased Intracellular Calcium. Both WCR and COVID-19 cause increased intracellular calcium. This results in “numerous secondary effect”, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Cardiac Effects. Both WCR and COVID-19 cause cardiac effects. These include “up-regulation of sympathetic nervous system”, cardiac arrhythmias, palpitations, myocarditis, myocardial ischemia, cardiac injury, and cardiac failure.

Despite the correlations between symptoms, many experts and organizations want humanity to believe there is no similarity between RF-EMF 5G WCR and COVID-19. There is currently no standard method of determining whether symptoms produced result from COVID-19, or RF-EMF Radiation.

Throughout the coronavirus pandemic, concentration of infected cases in America, directly mirrored the clustered locations of 5G cell towers assembled for the October 31st, 2019 launch.

The Truth About 5G

The World Health Organization (WHO) states9 “Currently, exposure from 5G infrastructures at around 3.5 GHz is similar to that from existing mobile phone base stations. With the use of multiple beams from 5G antennas, exposure could be more variable as a function of location of the users and their usage. Given that the 5G technology is currently at an early stage of deployment, the extent of any change in exposure to radiofrequency fields is still under investigation.”

The WHO warns of the increasing prevalence of 5G using “beam-forming antennas to focus signals more efficiently towards the device in use, rather than having the signal spread in broad directions as in current base station antennas.”

5G’s Implementation

5G Street Lights

5g will likely replace all other forms of telecommunications across the world. 5G “smart lights” have already begun their implementation throughout societies around the world. These 5G lights will become part of the future’s “smart cities”, described as having the ability to

• use charging piles
• utilize video surveillance
• utilize “environmental protection monitoring
• produce public announcements
• produce emergency calls

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), as well as other organizations, purchase 5G smart streetlights from Cowboy Streetlight Concealments, an company specializing in ‘surveillance products for government agencies’.

Cowboy Streetlight Concealments –

Upon entering Cowboy Streetlight Concealments’ website, a warning reads

“Cowboy Concealments provides products only made available to Law Enforcement Members. Secure Access is Provided to only Members of Federal, State, or Local Law Enforcement Agencies. Upon Access you are confirming you will treat the information as Confidential.”

“Cowboy Streetlight Concealments LLC is a small business located out of Texas that serves the whole United States. We are well versed in the surveillance needs of law enforcement and provide cameras to fit every need. Our products include street cameras, body cameras, as well as other concealment cameras. Our previous sales have been to both local and state law enforcement agencies. Contact us to learn more about our federal contracting abilities.”

Beyond government surveillance, many fear the unnecessary radiation associated with 5G streetlights. As more smart technology begins its implementation within society, unpredictable biological changes are more likely to occur, along with increasing hesitancy to embrace the new 5G street-lights and other cutting-edge telecommunication devices.

6G and Beyond

Countries like China10 have already begun the development of 6G and 7G technologies. What detrimental health effects will begin to occur throughout humanity with the prevalence and increasing intensity of Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic Field Radiation? Only once the existence of Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic Field Radiation, its dangers, and preventions become common public knowledge will humans be able to advance telecommunication technology. As the radiofrequency is raised, a more powerful signal is created which then becomes physiologically and biologically destructive. Will our species develop methods of RF-EMF Radiation isolation to combat the evolution of 6G and beyond, before it’s too late?

Microwave Sickness

Similar to the biological effects claimed to be produced by 5G technology, microwaves, another form of RF-EMF Radiation, are also known to produce a physiological sickness, depending on the microwave’s strength, duration, and frequency of exposure. Radiofrequencies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz. Microwaves are also a common household appliance. Beyond the kitchen, microwaves are used in radar guns, telephones, and television communications. While most home microwaves are shielded, and do not produce significant radiation, other forms of microwave radiation exist throughout the world. Prolonged exposure to microwave radiation causes the same effects as Wireless Communication Radiation (WCR) as they are both RF-EMF Radiation.

Statements

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) states11, “Man cannot escape exposure to some radiation.”

“There is a substantial body of evidence that this technology is harmful to humans and the environment. The 5G millimeter wave is known to heat the eyes, skin and testes… Of particular concern are the most vulnerable among us — the unborn, children, the infirm, the elderly and the disabled. It is also expected that populations of bees and birds will drastically decline.” Letter from oncologist Lennart Hardell MD & Colleagues

“When [Verizon] went out in these 11 [5G test] markets, we tested for well over a year, so we could see every part of foliage and every storm that went through. We have now busted the myth that [5G frequencies] have to be line-of-sight — they do not. We busted the myth that foliage will shut [5G] down . . . that does not happen. And the 200 feet from a home? We are now designing the network for over 2,000 feet from transmitter to receiver, which has a huge impact on our capital need going forward. Those myths have disappeared.” –Lowell McAdam, CEO of Verizon

“[Verizon 5G] is really high frequency [28,000 MHz and 39,000 MHz], so everybody thinks it doesn’t go very far, but it’s a really big pipe and so that’s what allows you to gain the super fast speeds . . We’re 3,000 feet away from our radio node. the cool thing about this is that we did not move the radio node. . . here even 3,000 feet away, we’re still getting 1,000 [Megabits per second] speeds . . . So now we’ve driven about 1/3 of a mile away [1,760 feet] from the radio node. we are still getting very good speeds even though we have foliage in between [800 Megabits per second].” –Jason L., Verizon Field Engineer

“We recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry…RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.” — The 5G Scientific Appeal (An Appeal signed by more than 250 scientists and doctors from 35 countries)

“[A]n almost total lack (as yet) of high-quality epidemiological studies of adverse human health effects from 5G EMF exposure specifically, but rapidly emerging epidemiological evidence of such effects from past generations of RF-EMF exposure; (4) persistent allegations that some national telecommunications regulatory authorities do not base their RF-EMF safety policies on the latest science, related to unmanaged conflicts of interest.” – John William Frank

“[O]ne cannot dismiss the growing health concerns about RF-EMFs, especially in an era when higher population levels of exposure are occurring widely, due to the spatially dense transmitters which 5G systems require”

Depopulation Theory

If the COVID-19 virus was obtained, re-manufactured, weaponized, and released by the Chinese Communist Party in an effort to distract the public from the health effects of the 5G rollout, this would provide a very real threat to society. Directly mimicking the side effects of RF-EMF 5G Radiation, each “variant” of the COVID-19 virus presents the exact same symptoms, yet each iteration evokes a new hysteria, preparing our species for certain annihilation.

As new vaccines continue to rapidly appear with every variant, the majority of the population has been convinced of the need to undergo regular injections, without question. Could mRNA vaccines play a role in removing the symptoms of 5G radiation? As 5G continues being pumped through our bodies, slowly destroying the immune system, and weakening our DNA, who is at the highest risk of immediate COVID-19-like symptoms produced by 5G Radiation? Could unvaccinated individuals be more susceptible to harmful 5G radiation, as world governments continue to mandate vaccines for people of all ages. This would ensure that companies could continue profiting off the development of the 5G grid, while publicly covering up the symptoms of 5G radiation.

As people around the world increasingly begin to succumb to the 5G’s effects, could the coronavirus pandemonium continue to hypnotize the global population long enough for a mass purge to begin to take effect? It very well may already have. 5G could be a coordianted mass depopulation effort, strategically executed by the decentralized leaders of the world, in conjunction with the Chinese Communist Party, pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions, If mRNA technology had the ability to mask physical symptoms of 5G for up to six months, the world’s population may be in for a slow and controlled medical democide, while raking in trillions of dollars in the process. A transfer of wealth may be in effect, using the currency of human lives.

As the world’s population begin to die off, the wealth and control of the people is dispersed and given to the higher physical power, in this case the very ones responsible for the 5G depopulation. In order for this to exist, a great distraction would need to take effect. Something believable that drove fear into the hearts of the citizens of the state: An infectious disease. Even as the coronavirus begins to die down, governments, mainstream media, and Big Tech oligarchs continue to revolve around the virus. Mass propaganda is heavily and consistently pushed despite the number of vaccinated individuals. Vaccines, and masks are still required in many major cities, regardless of if it is your decision.

Conclusion

The NIH has warned of the effects of 5G without thorough testing, citing their concerns in an official report. Concerned scientists from numerous countries advocated a 5G moratorium12 until further testing could be conducted. The refusal of this concern highlights the fact that society became reliant on this technology long before adequate testing could be properly conducted.

While the scientific community claims that 5G technically falls below “human exposure limits,” their stance does not advocate the long-term exposure to daily 5G radiation. As with the rise of the COVID-19 vaccines, nobody really knows what long term effects may present themselves.

Some official reports denounce these scientific findings as conspiracy theories, citing the impact of misinformation using ‘the burning of 5G towers in the United Kingdom.’ Should it be wrong to question the legitimacy of new technology? In the case of extremists, acknowledging the dangers of 5G, and destroying 5G towers will do nothing to prevent the evolution of its existence. The solution must be applied to the individual, as the world sees an increase in the production of RF-EMF blocking clothing, many consider moving to less populated regions. Exposing the impacts of 5G radiation, allows individuals to have a choice, and make their own decision. The ability to make a conscience, and well thought out personal decision is often manipulated by the ruling class, influenced by propaganda, and distorted by corporate organizations.

Is 5G responsible for symptoms of COVID-19? After the outbreak of the pandemic, humanity has endured a biological change to our civilization that very well may remain permanent. With the introduction of two revolutionary and controversial technologies, the human race may never truly be able to decipher between RF-EMF 5G Radiation and the perpetual variants of COVID-19. Could this have been strategically calculated to defer health risks to 5G, similar to the rise of big tobacco? Despite the hazards and environmental harm dispersed by these technologies, the majority of the population is kept in the dark to the risks involved with the evolution of each new additive digital product. As the line between human and technology begins to blur, how will biotechnology and transhumanism impact the future of 5G technology? What health risks will be revealed in future developments and iterations? How reliant will we become on RF-EMF technology before we consider the risks to the sustainability of our species?