What little has come out is extremely late, curiously timed to the 2024 election, and represents cover stories in their own regard.
In June of this year, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued its report ‘Potential Links Between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Origins of the COVID-19 Pandemic.’ Analysis of the report against the backdrop of a substantial catalog of evidence indicates that the ODNI report is a covering exit strategy to control unavoidable circumstances. Those circumstances include the devastating effects of the mRNA “vaccines” and entangling the Biden family via Metabiota via Labyrinth Global Health, Inc., via Black & Veatch via COVID-19 contracts with the US Department of Defense.
The problematic aspects of ODNI’s report begin with the word ‘potential’ in the title.
There’s no ‘potential’ when US federal dollars flowed from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID through the conduit of Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
There’s no ‘potential’ when artificial HIV inserts are discovered in SARS-CoV-2 as an indicator of ‘gain of function’ work, which means the virus was weaponized.
There’s no ‘potential’ when the evidence indicates that SARS-CoV-2, which, according to US patent filings attached to it and whereby federal law prohibits patenting anything that is naturally occurring, was bioengineered at the WIV.
There’s no ‘potential’ when a whistleblower and former doctor from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Li-Meng Yan, indicates that her lab developed SARS-CoV-2 as a bioweapon while she worked there.
‘Potential’ is a key word for an exit.
Another troublesome aspect here is ODNI’s delinquent timing relative to the 2024 election, as overlaid by the fact that, to a certain depth, much of the information cited in this report has been available in the public domain for several years.
Of course, we have no idea about the classified annex contents, though.
ODNI report’s Executive Summary states [emphasis added]:
(U) This report responds to the COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023, which called for the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) to declassify information relating to potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report outlines the IC’s understanding of the WIV, its capabilities, and the actions of its personnel leading up to and in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report does not address the merits of the two most likely pandemic origins hypotheses, nor does it explore other biological facilities in Wuhan other than the WIV. A classified annex to this report includes information that was necessary to exclude from the unclassified portion of this report in order to protect sources and methods, but the information contained in the annex is consistent with the unclassified assessments contained in this report.
(U) This report was drafted by the National Intelligence Officer for Weapons of Mass Destruction and Proliferation and coordinated with the IC
For one, and according to the aggregate analysis at Moonshine, the intelligence community having jurisdiction is problematic for the reasons that follow.
The intelligence community is the spine to a long timeline of geopolitical corruption, criminality, biowarfare, assassinations, and treason, and this is the same intelligence community that is charged with declassifying COVID-19 origins information.
The COVID-19 origins information attaches to US federal dollars and is direct evidence of the biowarfare cited.
In one instance, funding from Anthony Fauci’s NIAID flowed through the conduit of Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance to the WIV.
On its face, it’s ludicrous to believe that ODNI under Biden is going to come forward with anything off-reservation or further damaging to an already collapsed COVID-19 narrative.
Secondly, ODNI’s scope is extremely limited in its failure to address the merits of the two floated COVID-19 origins hypotheses, which remain cover stories themselves, and in its failure to consider other biolabs in China or elsewhere [like the over 40 US Department of Defense biolabs in Ukraine].
Thirdly, but not surprisingly, there is a classified annex containing further information, and therefore, our only indicator is that the two information sets are said to be consistent with one another according to ODNI’s words.
Fourthly, ODNI is wielding ‘sources and methods’ for concealment purposes, which is a staple hiding spot for the intelligence and law enforcement communities.
What little has come out is extremely late, curiously timed to the 2024 election, and represents cover stories in their own regard.
Lastly, the ODNI report was authored by the National Intelligence Officer for Weapons of Mass Destruction and Proliferation.
The calibration of COVID-19 to biowarfare via its categorization under WMD/proliferation is direct evidence of 1-positions established in very early 2020 and 2-my 06 May 20 statement that President Trump was a wartime president and that the US is embroiled in an asymmetrical, irregular, and undeclared war against China according to China’s stated and preferred doctrinal warfare vector of biowarfare.
The WMD categorization falls back on analysis from my 06 May 20 article, Making the Case for Treason:
Moreover, there were multiple incidents of Chinese nationals smuggling bio-weapons that were interrupted, and one relates to an FBI tactical intelligence report on WMDDs (weapons of mass destruction) that gave the FBI notice of the China viral outbreak circa October 2019 two months before the World Health Organization (WHO) was made aware. More troublesome is that the attached ancillary intelligence report was marked FISA. Even more troubling is the FBI’s failure to meet its onus of reporting the outbreak – a national security concern – to the DOD as they are compelled to do. Why was the DOD kept in the dark? Was it that pesky intelligence report marked FISA coupled with WMDD and tying back to folks interested in winning 2020? In short, likely.
As Speaker of the House, Pelosi is an ex officio member of Adam Schiff’s House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. They would have been privy to the aforementioned intelligence reports, especially given the national security implications.
If the FBI knew in October 2019, so did Pelosi, presumably. What did Nancy do between October 2019 and 18 Dec 19? She apparently ignored the viral outbreak and instead drove a fraudulent impeachment scheme. Does that reflect intent, motivation, means, access, opportunity, and dereliction of duty? What about other high crimes and misdemeanors? Note that when we say Pelosi, it extends to her Chairmen and complicit others.
Political Moonshine on 06 May 20
The analysis on the FISA marker is a simple one that adheres to old ideas about constructs serving more than one purpose.
Obama et al. were abusing FISA/FISC as a mechanism of intelligence gathering on their political opponents.
With FISA/FISC already a compromised and effective mechanism for intelligence gathering, the lane for the most success and the least risk was applying FISA warrants to subjects executing their own designed criminality.
By assigning FISA markers to their own kind and because FISC is the most secretive known court in the country that supersedes other jurisdictions to prevent any agency or department from further discussion or action, Obama/Biden et al. were able to use FISA to vacuum-up evidence of their own ongoing criminality to seal it away at the highest and most secretive level.
Beyond the targeting of political opposition, that’s how I believe FISC/FISA was/is being used by the Obama/Biden cartel, and I wrote a piece on it in April 2020.
702 FISA warrants permit the intelligence community to surveil foreign subjects and subjects who are US citizens for the purpose of collecting information.
The component of ‘intelligence hops’ bears down very hard here.
For example, FISC may authorize agents and officers using Section 702 warrants to extend out the scope of the warrant to include people contacting the warrant subject in the context of the warrant by 2 or 3 levels of contact.
When this occurs, the FISA warrant “hops” to the contacting individual, making him a subject of the warrant.
If, for example, the intelligence community dispatched a foreign asset like Joseph Misfud to engage with someone who interacted with President Trump, like former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopolous, President Trump is only one or two “hops” away from being a FISA warrant subject.
Then, if DOJ cared to pursue a prosecution of President Trump, a Special Counsel could be appointed like Robert Mueller was in 2017.
President Trump was [is?] a FISA warrant subject, so you can do the math there.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is a critical tool for protecting our national security. It enables the U.S. Intelligence Community to collect, analyze, and share foreign intelligence information on individual terrorists, weapons proliferators, hackers, and other foreign intelligence targets. Take a deeper look at how we use FISA Section 702, how privacy and civil liberties safeguards are built into our work, and how our use of these tools is overseen by all three branches of government.
The initial investigation into President Trump was begun as a counterintelligence investigation and then later transitioned to a criminal investigation.
Targeting Trump with a FISA warrant allowed Obama/Biden et al. to avoid the higher evidentiary threshold required for a criminal warrant.
So then, once the counterintelligence investigation was off the ground and running, it was laundered into a criminal investigation by the DOJ.
The DOJ inherited the FISA-based counterintelligence investigation and laundered it into a criminal case, appointing Robert Mueller, who personally delivered yellow cake uranium samples to a Russian runway in the Hillary Clinton Uranium One scandal, as Special Counsel to prosecute it.
In actuality, though, establishment pit bull and Leftist stalwart Andrew Weissmann ran that operation and the entire DOJ since anything that mattered fell under the Special Counsel’s scope and purview.
FISA permitted Obama/Biden et al. to circumvent three things: 1-a higher evidentiary threshold required for a criminal warrant on Trump, 2-Trump’s fundamental rights guaranteed by the US Constitution, and 3-the CIA’s own directive that prevents it from operating domestically, much less on a sitting president.
COVID-19 was a “pandemic” of enterprise fraud in service to a multifaceted coup d’etat that permitted the theft of the 2020 election as a mechanism to remove a sitting president, and the intelligence community is the spine to all of it.
This is the same intelligence community that made declassification decisions and then authored and issued this COVID-19 origins report while hiding behind a classified annex from inside of a ‘sources and methods’ bunker.
THE ANALYSIS holds that ODNI is in damage control mode to steer the unavoidable circumstances of the back end of a fraudulent “pandemic” and its failed narrative to the most advantageous and acceptable landing spot.
At the same time, ODNI is serving up multiple origins cover stories to choose from and with no commitment to either one nor to any effort to further investigate for the truth.
It is clear that the ODNI report is an important component to a broader COVID-19 exit strategy.
That exit strategy is required as a remedy for the establishment’s failed COVID-19 narrative.
That exit strategy is required because the President and Commander-in-Chief Joe Biden and the Department of Defense are central nodes that are reinforced by a wide swath of similarly compromised politicians and unelected federal bureaucrats.
That exit strategy is required because the intelligence community that conscripted all of these players owns a failed narrative associated with unprecedented death and destruction, and it needs an out now, before 2024.
Be warned, though.
Although SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 is going away, the construct into which it was plugged will never go away. Instead, it will be the model for global governance in the form of medical tyranny.
All that’s needed is a new virus to plug in, and there’s no shortage of those.
In part two, we will further dismantle the ODNI report in greater detail, including Q&A from one of America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr. Lynn Fynn.
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.