We Only Know What We Know (When We Know It)

Over the past few months, this publication carried three arcs — the Arcane Arc, the American Blueprint, and Contact Counter-Current — more than two dozen articles in all, each one built around a person, or a lineage, who had contact with something not human and did something with it afterward. This piece sits on top of all three: a survey, not a verdict. The idea from the start was to lay the competing messages and the competing messengers side by side and let the reader take from each article whatever actually resonates with them — not whatever resonates with me, and not whatever the loudest voice in the room insists is settled. What I noticed as the articles went out was worth naming on its own: certain camps hardened into more absolutist positions about “their” messenger the moment a contradiction surfaced, while other camps waved off the similarities I’d laid out entirely, simply because the person or history in question didn’t match their preferred account. It wasn’t a huge rift, and I’m happy about that, but where there was a question, the gaps were obvious. Both reactions do the same thing from opposite directions. People aren’t really evaluating the messages, but they’re reconstructing history to fit the messenger they’ve already chosen to follow.

I wanted to address this with candor and mention my own experiences with this, as when I was active with Prepare for Change as a Council member, we saw these types of disagreements come up regularly and sometimes with extreme ferocity. During the pandemic years, we saw belief camps draw into semi-violent circles, and with hot topics like immigration, gender, history all on the block over the past decade, our alignment among topics has become pretty fractured. Sounds like human history on a microscale, huh? We can agree to disagree – and boy do we ever! But we need to pendulum back to some common ground, and that’s what I aimed to do when presenting the 3 recent arcs:

The Arcane Arc:

Or the American Blueprint Arc:

And the Contact Counter Current Arc:

After the past few months of work — the three arcs, 28ish articles, tracing people who received NHI contact and what they did with it, on the positive side, the negative side, and in the building of America itself — I wanted to step back and look at the unifying threads. Not just the content, but the reactions the articles pulled out of readers.

Information is data. That’s all it is. So when a person makes contact with a Non-Human Intelligence, what does that actually mean? What information are they receiving? I like getting philosophical about the cosmic teachings I’ve gone through, but I try to stay grounded with that extra layer of perspective — and perspective really is the word for it. You’ve heard the wordplay: History is His Story, and My Story is a Mystery. Clever, and also more true than it sounds. When I worked on these articles, I went looking for the common data — the stories that kept repeating across unrelated sources. The rule of thumb is that a person needs to encounter a concept independently something like six to eight times before it becomes part of their belief system. Once it does, it’s load-bearing.

Now, the people who’d like to control you and me already know that. The arc that profiled Michael Aquino touched, lightly, on his psyop material — the brainwashing techniques he detailed that later became standard script for the military, techniques still in regular use. Follow that thread and look at a psyop like “Q,” and you can see how a mission gets built: frame the flat-earth theory, or the space-landing doubts, or “where we go one we go all,” or any political campaign promise, as organic belief when it’s engineered messaging. As a communications professional, I pay close attention to this. Repetition is what turns a message into propaganda. And when the repetition comes from a source people already trust — a world-leading health official, say — people can be led to believe almost anything.

Those are the grand examples. The more granular ones show up when you narrow the lens to disclosure itself — the NHI themes, the territory Naradigm Shift’s recent arcs have been covering. We’re talking about contact and messages from higher-plane beings. They’d usually be called aliens or extraterrestrials, but even that language is shifting now, post-disclosure. Where they come from, how they get here — that alone eats up enormous time and energy in our communities. What they want from us, and why they might claim rights over us or this planet, is the other half of the story. So we end up having to delineate topic by topic, because different tribes and different cosmic contacts describe the same territory sometimes similarly and sometimes in flatly contradictory ways. That discordance isn’t a failure of the research. It’s part of the discovery.

To the end of what we believe service-to-others NHI are trying to tell us, it’s all summed up pretty well in this video which I posted on Friday. Some of you will see lots of truth in this video. Some may see deception. Some may be completely against the whole thing. We all create our own realities from information we see. Together, and the video says this specifically at some point, that 30% of the population need to act in a particular case to enact a certain galactic action. It said that in 2021 (I believe or 2020) that we were at the 24% threshold. I think in reference to believing that we’re oppressed by our controllers and want a change from that. That’s a global number, which you might think would be a lot higher. Apparently, the facing of that truth was still very taken for granted at that time, but this was pre pandemic and numbers of people who trust their controllers had risen, those calculating those numbers would say to the point where the threshold has been passed. Though, this audience is very keen on knowing how corrupt our system has become, there are still many who can’t seem to face that truth or concept. You know what they say about ignorance?

We only know what we know when we know it

In trying to reconcile all of what the 3 arcs presented or what the video presents, you can’t. That’s the common problem, and I hear it constantly. Some vocabulary crosses over between traditions, and some terms have been interpreted in wildly different ways by different people who all claim authority on the subject. The right move is to keep gathering information so you can progress — but to be careful not to overthink it.

The factions I’ve pointed out across this work still stop short of the larger questions — the kind you’re asking me now.

The work I did across the NHI communication arcs was narrower and, I’d argue, more useful: who has had contact, and what did they do with it. What do they claim to have done. By laying that out in detail, I wanted to open people up to something simple first — that contact has had a long, quiet influence here, longer than most timelines admit. From there, I wanted people to take that information and gain more sovereignty, more agency over their own thinking. Only after that — once liberation and empowerment are reasonably evident — would I start to wonder harder about the physics and the grand design behind all of it. That is how I approach it personally, and that is closer to my personal mission.

For me, it’s a lot like interpreting religions. They all have claims. There are many of them. Every single one is understandable from inside its own world. But hold two of them up against each other, and that’s where it turns into a fight over who said what, what’s been shown, and who believes what. Any outcome is possible. So the question I keep coming back to is simpler than cosmology: which of these gives you freedom, growth, understanding, love, peace, harmony — which one is actually looking out for humanity and helping us cross into this shift, whatever name you put on it — Shan, Sheen, Nova Gaia, Terra Nova?

I go back to the litmus test: which one helps human empowerment and planetary liberation, which is transparent, and can we see the result over time? That last note is really critical, because some of the claims are happening right now. Like, right now.

That’s the trap, really. The power of a good narrative is that it creates a He Said, She Said dynamic, and given enough time and devotion, that dynamic calcifies into religion. We’ve said before that following any one message, or any one messenger, eventually curdles into a cult. That’s exactly why I avoid it. I look instead for patterns — for commonalities, relationships, and the stories that keep showing up across sources that have no reason to be coordinating with each other.

One example, small but telling: a Galactic Federation message reportedly given to Aurora Ray recently claimed there are more than a thousand GFL bloggers currently active online. I’ll flag that as assessed intelligence, not documented fact — it’s a channeled claim, not a verified count — but even taken loosely, a thousand is a lot of people speaking for the same alleged source and in cases, not agreeing with each other.

That’s genuinely where I net out. The history is worth building from — you look for the stories that echo each other and let those threads braid together, and you hold the outlying claims at arm’s length until more information surfaces to confirm or kill them. I’ve tried not to run ahead of any claim before it’s had room to play itself out, even when that restraint costs me. There have been hundreds of people making claims in this space, plenty of them sincere, plenty of them channeling something they’ve taken or mistaken for a signal.

But restraint isn’t the same as paralysis, and this is where I want to land. Right now, my focus is on the here and now — getting through the shift, making contact, beginning the restoration and the healing. The stories, the deeper histories, the grand design — they’ll come out in time, and when they do, we’ll have far better teachers, with new perspectives and genuinely new ways of communicating, to help us make sense of them. Until then, let’s agree on what we can actually agree on, and stay open-minded enough to take in whatever comes next.

That’s where we are right now. Claims are circulating everywhere across the interwebs, and the videos keep coming — more footage, more testimony, more of it every week. Not all of it can be real. But not all of it is fake, either. If anything, we seem to be moving in the direction of more awareness, not less, and that raises the real question underneath all of this: does that awareness ultimately trap us, or does it liberate us? Knowing something is often what allows it to become real in our world. So which is it — does this end somewhere good, or does it end somewhere else? We will only know in time.

We only know what we know when we know it. That’s not a limitation. It’s the discipline.

Whatever the question, love is the answer. You have to believe it to see it.

— Gerry

Gerry Gomez is an investigative journalist, creative director, and hybrid war correspondent who has spent a decade documenting the convergence of financial, media, and geopolitical forces shaping the current global transition.