The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

 

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 outside of China, the World Health Organization (WHO) has taken a prominent role in the handling of the pandemic on a global level. The unquestioned power and influence of this organization created by the United Nations lead most governments around the world to shape their policies and pandemic response according to the WHO’s data and guidelines. In other words, nations enabled a global (and non-democratic) entity to dictate decisions that are taken on a national and local level.

The result of this direct pipeline between the WHO and national governments has been profound and far-reaching. Fueled by apocalyptic models and projections, governments were urged to confine their entire population while shutting down their entire economies for several months. The devasting consequences of this global lockdown are still difficult to quantify. However, a prediction made in my article COVID-19 Lockdown: A Global Human Experiment quickly came to fruition: Billions of dollars were funneled from the working class towards the elite.

So why is the WHO giving orders to nations and their democratically elected governments? Is it due to its proven track record and educated advice? Clearly not. Because the organization’s response to the pandemic at its earliest and most critical stages was nothing less than disastrous. Some might argue that it was even deliberate.

On January 14th, the WHO claimed that there was no human-to-human transmission – citing Chinese sources.

On February 4th, WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke against travel restrictions on China, saying such measures could cause “fear and stigma”. He added that there “no reason for panic and fear”, he said.

Since most world governments blindly followed the WHO’s recommendations, air travel from China continued for weeks and allowed the spread of the virus across the world. And, when some countries nevertheless moved forward to stop travel from China, the WHO actively lobbied against it.

The WHO directly lobbied against banning travel to countries, including China.

A statement released as late as February 29, argued against travel bans because they “may disrupt businesses, and may have negative social and economic effects on the affected countries”.

“WHO continues to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks,” the statement said.

“In general, evidence shows that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies is ineffective in most situations and may divert resources from other interventions.”

Academic research by the University of Southampton has revealed up to 95 percent of deaths would not have happened if the WHO acted earlier.
– SKY News, China used WHO in a bid to open Australia’s borders

The last sentence is particularly damning: 95% of deaths could have been avoided if the WHO did not go against travel bans from China. Considering the fact the WHO actively worked against the single most important measure to stop the spread of the virus, why is it still shaping government policies? Because it is linked to the global elite.

The Power of the WHO

Despite spreading information that was outright false and dangerous, the WHO remains unquestionably influential across the world. On April 18th, the organization showcased its immense power by broadcasting Together At Home, a massive media event that had countless celebrities and powerful people praise the WHO and the elite entities behind it.

The WHO is also heavily invested in controlling the flow of information regarding the virus.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

A headline from The Verdict.

Speaking on CNN’s Reliable Sources, YouTube CEO  Susan Wojcicki stated that the streaming platform would be “removing information that is problematic” and that would include “anything that is medically unsubstantiated”. She added:

“So people saying ‘take vitamin C; take turmeric, we’ll cure you’, those are the examples of things that would be a violation of our policy. Anything that would go against World Health Organisation recommendations would be a violation of our policy.”

Why would YouTube even care if people talked about vitamin C in their videos? Because, since the beginning of the outbreak, the WHO has been suspiciously against any kind of remedy or solution against COVID-19. Every single time a treatment shows promise, the WHO and the media system that caters to it are quick to warn against them and even label it as dangerous.

Why? Because the WHO is banking on a single, universal solution: A Vaccine.

A Vaccine and Nothing Else

To fully understand the mindset behind the WHO, we must look at the funding behind the WHO.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

Two of the five biggest funders of the WHO are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gavi Alliance. As seen in the article Bill Gates is Calling for a Digital ID to Idenfity Who is Vaccinated, these two organizations are advocating for using vaccines to create a global ID system using some sort of implant. COVID-19 is the perfect occasion for them to make this happen.

To make sure this happens, the world needs to live in fear and without a cure until that vaccine is released.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

One of the many headlines warning against any kind of cure or treatment.

The WHO is also fighting against the most “natural” remedy to a virus: Herd immunity. Indeed, considering the fact that COVID-19 is non-deadly to healthy people, allowing the population to naturally develop antibodies against the virus by just living with it is probably the most natural way to combat it. Some countries such as Sweden defied the WHO’s dogma, refused to confine its population, and is now claiming that herd immunity could be achieved by June. Of course, the WHO is warning against this strategy. Media sources that are completely sold to the WHO’s agenda have been hard at work to shun this age-old concept. Here’s a headline from The Guardian.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

The article can be summed up in two quotes:

“The simple fact is that herd immunity, without a vaccine, is not an easy way forward.”

And the article ends with this aberrant statement.

 “I can’t speak for everyone, but personally I’d rather stay inside for a few more months and still see my parents next year.”

These statements are 100% in line with the WHO’s true agenda: No freedom without a vaccine. In order to justify this line of thinking, the article talks about the “sacrifice of the vulnerable on the altar of the economy”. Not unlike other articles warning against any kind of solution, it goes to extremes by claiming that herd immunity would kill millions of elderly people, without considering the fact that a strategy of targeted quarantines could be used for the most vulnerable while allowing healthy people to remain free.

Here’s another article pushing the same agenda.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

The article argues that the only solution is an all-out police state.

“We won’t get to herd immunity in the near future. A miracle drug is not in sight. The only way to restart the economy, then, is to put a highly effective system in place to test millions of people, trace their movements, and quickly quarantine those who might have been infected.”

This quote leads us to another reason why the WHO and its elite system want COVID anxiety to last as long as possible: The justification of population surveillance.

Using COVID to Enable Big Brother

Here are some magazine covers and headlines that popped up in the past week.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

“Can Big Brother Save Us?” on a French magazine.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

A mind-boggling headline from the Times UK.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

“Quebec prepares its Big Brother for the 2nd wave”. Cell phones could be tracked,

The WHO has been telling the world that the only viable solution is a vaccine. And they say that a vaccine could take months or years to be available. So what happens until they decide that a vaccine is ready? A police state where high tech surveillance, bio-paranoia, and the forced quarantine of selected people at a moment’s notice. Big Brother is now a “savior” as the constant tracking of individuals and the people they come in contact with is portrayed as the only solution to save lives.

Telling fact: Theresa Tam, Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, who is currently at the forefront of the country’s pandemic response (while fully abiding by the WHO’s guidelines) appeared in bizarre 2010 movie about a pandemic. The movie “OUTBREAK: Anatomy of a Plague” is about the fictional scenario of the resurgence of smallpox in Canada. What she says during the movie is stunning.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

Theresa Tam in the movie “Outbreak: Anatomy of a Plague”.

In the movie, Tam talks about measures to be taken if there’s an outbreak of smallpox. She says:

“If there are people who are non-compliant, there are definitely laws and public health powers that can quarantine people in mandatory settings.”

She adds:

“It’s potential you can track people, put bracelets on their arms, have police and other setups to ensure quarantine.”

The narrator of the movie continues:

“Police checkpoints are set up on all the bridges and everyone leaving the city required to show proof of vaccination. Those who refuse to cooperate are taken away to temporary detention centers.”

Since the beginning of the COVID outbreak, the WHO has been steadily guiding the world towards a police state until the release of an approved vaccine. In many ways, the WHO is looking for the entire world to follow the lead of the most advanced high-tech police state in the world: China.

Worldwide China

Through its Orwellian social credit system, its horrific re-education camps, its brutal suppression of dissenting voices, and its constant surveillance of its population, China has been a laboratory for a high-tech new world order. Furthermore, several elite-connected corporations have been aiding China to achieve its aims. Unsurprisingly enough, the WHO has been steadily praising this oppresive regime.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

WHO director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus with the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Xi Jinping.

Here’s an extremely symbolic tweet Ghebreyesus’ official account:

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

At center of the above picture is the hindu deity Shiva, also known as “The Destroyer”. Through destruction, Shiva enables profound transformation. This goes in hand with the elite’s favorite motto: Order Out of Chaos.

Telling fact: There’s also a prominent statue of Shiva at CERN.

The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China

A screenshot taken from the CERN website about the unveiling of its Shiva statue in 2004.

In Conclusion

The WHO has been handling this pandemic in a very specific manner. When the virus was solely contained in China, the WHO denounced governments that were looking to restrict travel originating from China. Despite every ounce of common sense, the WHO claimed that restricting travel would not be effective against the spreading of the virus. Once the virus spread across the world, the WHO then pushed for the most the restrictive and destructive confinement policies in human history, causing a massive crash of the economy and a complete reshaping society.

In this unhealthy environment, the WHO strived and went for massive power grabs. The organization is now pushing for the prolonging of these measures and the creation of high-tech police states while waiting for the only cure it will ever approve: A universal vaccine. Considering the fact that Bill Gates is the current top funder of the WHO and that he is also part of ID2020 – which is advocating for using vaccines to create a digital ID using a tattoo or a microchip – we can clearly see what is the true agenda of the WHO: To create a worldwide China.

P.S. The economic crisis caused by COVID-19 has caused a massive drop in advertising revenues, making it difficult for independent websites such as The Vigilant Citizen to remain afloat. If you appreciated this article, please consider showing your support through a small monthly donation on Patreon. If you prefer, you can also make a one-time donation here. Your support will help this site navigate these difficult times as it continues to provide vital information and analysis on a regular basis. Thank you!

 

Source: https://vigilantcitizen.com

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

4 thoughts on “The True Agenda of the WHO: A New World Order Modeled After China”

  1. This is published by the United People Foundation, part of the initiative of Ronald Bernard.

    The new Declaration of Human Rights

    Article 1.
    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of sister- and brotherhood.

    Article 2.
    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this New Declaration of Human Rights, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, understanding of the Creator of heaven and earth (God), political, religious or another opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or another status.

    Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

    Article 3.
    Everyone has the right to a life of dignity, liberty, and unabridged security of person. The right to life and to inviolability begins as soon as the human comes into being in the mother’s womb.

    Article 4.
    No one shall be held in slavery or servitude, including debt slaves involved in a financial debt contract with interest charges; slavery and the slave trade shall, therefore, be prohibited in all their forms.

    Article 5.
    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; not even if these are carried out by order of government bodies, secret agencies, religious organizations, or powerful companies.

    Article 6.
    Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

    Article 7.
    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this New Declaration of Human Rights and against any incitement to such discrimination.

    Article 8.
    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

    Article 9.
    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile; not even if these are carried out by order of government bodies, the state, secret agencies, religious organizations, military personnel, or powerful companies.

    Article 10.
    Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

    Article 11.
    Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.

    No one shall be held guilty of any penal offense on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offense, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offense was committed.

    Article 12.
    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

    Article 13.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

    Article 14.
    Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of United People.

    Article 15.
    Everyone has the right to a nationality. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

    Article 16.
    Men and women of the full age of 18 years or older, without any limitation due to race, nationality or understanding of the Creator of heaven and earth (God), political or religious preference, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during the marriage, and at its dissolution.

    Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by the United People, society and the State.

    Article 17.
    Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property; not even by government bodies, the state, banks, or tax authorities.

    Article 18.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, understanding of the Creator of heaven and earth (God), and religion; this right includes freedom to change his thinking, religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his thinking, conscience, understanding of the Creator of heaven and earth (God), religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance.

    All these forms of thinking, conscience, understanding of the Creator of heaven and earth (God), and religion are to be respected insofar as they are peaceable expressions that are of service to humanity and all the other life on earth. Those forms which do not respect in full the New Declaration of Human Rights are outlawed with immediate effect.

    Article 19.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. All forms of censorship are unlawful.

    Article 20.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

    Article 21.
    Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. Everyone has the right to equal access to the co-operative public services in his country.

    The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of the state, government, or any other steering body appointed by the people. This will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

    Article 22.
    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

    Article 23.
    Everyone has the right to work which, where available, shall match the knowledge and skill of the person concerned; to free choice of employment; to just and favorable conditions of work, and to protection against unemployment.

    Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. Everyone who works has the right to just and favorable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

    Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

    Article 24.
    Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

    Article 25.
    Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

    Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection. Consequently, it is unlawful for the state, a government body or a local authority to require a child’s parents by law or regulation to have the child vaccinated either before or after birth or to require the child to have Vitamin K administered at birth. The parents of a child are under an obligation to research the consequences for the child, including in the long term, of vaccination.

    Article 26.
    Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

    Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights, including these new human rights, and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance, and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of United People in support of peace.

    Parents have a prior right and responsibility to choose the kind of education and upbringing that shall be given to their children to allow them to attain their maximum development.

    Article 27.
    Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

    Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary, or artistic production of which he is the author.

    Article 28.
    Everyone is responsible for ensuring and is entitled to, a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this New Declaration of Human Rights can be fully realized.

    Article 29.
    Everyone has duties to the community and to the United People, in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by the co-operative collective by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in society.

    These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of United People. The principle of a Good Stewardship of All Life shall be decisive in their interpretation.

    Article 30.
    Nothing in this New Declaration of Human Rights may be interpreted as implying for any State, government body, secret agency, political, religious or military organization, powerful company, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

    Source: https://unitedpeople-foundation.org/new-human-rights

    Reply
  2. That list of “Biggest WHO funders” it list Germany last, it shouldn’t be there at all considering they are still an occupied country! They do as they are told.

    Reply
    • Hello Jon, could you explain, please, how Germany does as its told? By whom?
      I’ve noticed that there are many initiatives for reform and sharing of information,
      in Germany, in gatherings with those who choose a different path.
      They’re quite active in translating documents and interviews from English to German.
      I live in The Netherlands, and I’m able to speak and read Gerrman as well.

      Reply
      • Germany is still occupied, which means they do not have the free will of the Germans in matters that makes a nation free. Take freedom of speech for example, if one questions the holocaust you end up in jail. Germany to this day has NATO occupying her. How many United States bases are there? Let’s not go into who plopped their butts back into the bankers executive chairs once they destroyed Germany after the supposed end of WW2.

        Reply

Leave a Comment