By Lianne Lawrence,

Canada’s largest newspaper threatened Catholic schools in an editorial that unless they get in line with homosexuality and transgender “rights,” support will only grow for an end to their public funding.

The Toronto Star’s Monday editorial also excoriated beleaguered Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) trustee Mike Del Grande and called for the board to censure him.

Del Grande — along with Teresa Lubinski, Garry Tanuan and Nancy Crawford — voted November 7 after months of bitter debate not to add “gender identity, gender expression, family status and marital status” to the TCDSB’s code of conduct as prohibited grounds for discrimination.

The many delegates and opponents of the policy change argued that adding the terms endorses spurious gender ideology in Catholic schools in contravention of Catholic teaching, leading to great harm to students.

But eight trustees led by chair Maria Rizzo voted to include the terms, arguing that the board had to follow a ministry directive to align its code of conduct with the provincial code and the Ontario Human Rights Code.

And now LGBTQ activists are piling on in an all-out attack on Del Grande, who is running for chair of the board in an upcoming election that will be held November 28.

He’s under fire for proposing — in an act of mockery to make a point — an amendment duing the night of the vote that the board add other categories of sexual identities to the code, such as pedophilia, bestiality, sadism, polygamy, and cannibalism, arguing that doing so would be truly “inclusive.”

Del Grande later described the amendment — which was ruled out of order — as a “Howard Moscoe thing” referring to a former left-wing Toronto city councillor known for outspokenness, and “hyperbolic.”

However, not only did parent-activist Nicole Richard launch a petition asking for Del Grande’s removal, but Maura Lawless, executive director of the LGBTQ activist group The 519, sent a letter to Rizzo asking the board to publicly denounce Del Grande and ask for his resignation.

The 519 letter is notable for documenting the homosexual advocacy group’s “long working relationship with the TCDSB” in order to “provide a wide range of programming since 2012.”

“The 519’s primary contacts are the Superintendent of Equity, Diversity & Indigenous Education, Community Relations Department, Nick D’Avella and the Superintendent Areas 7 & 8 Settlement Services & Newcomers, Jodelyn Huang,” Lawless wrote.

Now the Toronto Star has weighed in, calling for the TCDSB to “publicly denounce” Del Grande and “affirm the rights of LGBTQ students” in order to “heal the rift his actions — and the board’s endless bickering over these basic human rights — have caused.”

“It bears repeating that if this board continues to leave open doubts about its commitment to rights for all, support will only grow for another option: an end to public funding for Catholic schools,” the Star opined.

It’s far from the first time Canada’s biggest newspaper has pushed for the dissolution of Catholic education.

In a November 10 editorial, the Star berated the four TCDSB trustees who voted against adding “gender identity” and “gender expression” to the code, noting that “even the Archdiocese of Toronto…rightly understood the need to include those terms.”

If trustees insist on “digging in their heels there is, of course, an alternative,” the Star noted. “That’s an end to public funding for Catholic schools.”

Public appetite for the constitutional amendment required to dissolve Catholic schools may grow, the Star warned, “if members of the Catholic community continue to use religious doctrine as an excuse to oppose necessary progress in what are, first and foremost, public schools.”

Education Minister Sam Lecce also called out Del Grande at Queen’s Park Monday, tweeted the Star’s reporter Kristin Rushowy:

But Crawford and Tanuan came to Del Grande’s defense, saying he was trying to make the point that the consequences of opening the door to gender ideology in Catholic schools will be far-reaching.

That was echoed by executive director of Parents As First Educators (PAFE) Teresa Pierre in an email to supporters.

Del Grande’s comments have been taken out of context, she said.

The proposed amendment was a “clearly facetious motion intended to draw attention to how absurdly long a listing of grounds of discrimination could potentially become,” and “a rhetorical strategy to make his point that separating people into groups by shared characteristics is reductive and not consistent with a Catholic view of the human person,” noted Pierre.

Del Grande is a “courageous advocate for preserving Catholic education,” Pierre said, with which Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Coalition, Canada’s national pro-life, pro-family political lobbying group agrees.

“Del Grande should be praised by every Catholic for his heroic defense of the Catholic faith, especially in the face of this type of hatred from the left-wing media,” Fonseca told LifeSiteNews.

He blasted the Star for “anti-Catholic bigotry” and dismissing the traditional beliefs held not only by the Catholic Church but other Christian denominations as well as Muslims and Jews.

“Today, the Star is ghettoizing Christians, calling for their democratic and civil rights to be stripped from them, and even the benefits of their own tax dollars with respect to funding of Catholic schools, which they themselves pay for,” said Fonseca.

“The bigotry of the media must end.”

A report appended to the agenda the night of the board’s final vote stated the Toronto archdiocese had approved the terms, provided these were understood through a “Catholic lens.”

In a November 11 statement, the archdiocese conceded it accepted the terms are included in the code, but added: “we do not accept the view of the human person which underlies this terminology, since that view is not compatible with our faith.” (See full statement here.)

That is trying “to have your cake and eat it too,” Campaign Life Coalition’s youth coordinator Josie Luetke pointed out.

“If the archdiocese does not accept the view of the human person which underlies the terminology, then it should not have accepted the terminology,” she told LifeSiteNews in an earlier email.

“Gender identity” and “gender expression” are “inherently misleading terms which cannot be redeemed,” Luetke added.



Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.


  1. looks like bigotry is wearing its ugly head with Karl McGaugh
    Source has no gender you seem to be a Fascist theocrat rather than
    a Spiritual seeker but i do agree that the LGBTQ is very hedonistic
    & that there Agenda to to disrupt Traditional roles but your homophobia
    only plays into there hands

  2. Taxpayers pay the state and the state gives it to that dark force’s agenda supporter church run by gay men. That’s not only poor economics but it forces the taxpayers, many of whom are women, to support the very a church that torchered, raped and burned millions of women at the stake; a protection racket of lies and false pretense of virtue.

    In truth, gay men are the ‘Goddess gift to women’ so we can heal from centuries of abuse. And, because we reincarnate again and again in which we live in the body as a male and then a female to master those energies and gain wisdom, gay men should not be looked upon as different from those who are not gay, but have made a different choice from which to learn. Often, making a choice to have a same sex relationship helps the individuals to make the switch to the gender not yet experienced.

    I enjoy the friendship of gay men because they respect my space and respect me. And most are fun. Something not often found in men looking for someone to sexually service them, with no consideration for what they are doing to the woman who is used as a dumping ground for his poor health habits and ego assumptions.

  3. GOOD GRIEF! doesn’t Canada have the separation of church & state rule that states no public monies are to go to parochial schools?? THIS ASTOUNDS way in hell should ANY religion-based school get public funds!! what’s going on with that!?!?!

    bad enough churches are tax exempt, which I will NEVER understand…….oh well…….

  4. Our creator created us for His purpose and NOT for our purpose. To deny the natural order of male and female procreation is mental illness. We have free choice in many things but the consequences of choosing poorly are unhealthy! Girly-men are still men and Manly-women are still women. Our genes make this choice for us and all we can do is accept what we were given and make the most of it WITHOUT denial or imaginary thinking. Rational and loving people will accept us for whatever our creator created and we will be successful.
    Religious institutions that bend to politically correct policies are fake news. History and science are on the side of inspired teaching which denies the sexual perversions of the LGBTQ+ fad. Seek Truth within and without and the wisdom of inspired teachings will fulfill your true destiny.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here